期刊文献+

抗DNA酶B和抗链“O”在风湿热诊断中的应用 被引量:2

The Application of Anti-Dnase B and Antistreptolysin “O”Microtitration Test in the Diagnosis of Acute Rheumatic Fever
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估抗DNA酶B和抗链“O”(ASO)在溶血性链球菌感染的血清学检测对风湿热的诊断价值。方法:抗DNA酶B用微量法,ASO用速率散射比浊法,测定77例急性风湿热患者,35例活动期风湿性心脏病患者,5 0例对照组。结果:急性风湿热组ASO阳性率76 .6 % ,与抗DNA酶B71.4 %差异无显著性(χ2 =0 .8310 ,P>0 .0 5 ) ,二者同时检测阳性率为92 .2 % ,显著高于单一检测(χ2分别为7.10 77、12 .2 775 ,P<0 .0 5 ;活动期风湿性心脏病ASO阳性率5 4 .3%显著低于抗DNA酶B85 .7%的阳性率(χ2 =2 0 .16 ,P<0 .0 1,二者同时检测阳性率可达91.4 % ,显著高于单纯ASO检测(χ2 =0 .12 75 ,P>0 .0 5 )。结论:ASO和抗DNA酶B联合检测可提高诊断阳性率,对风湿热的诊断具有重要的临床价值。 Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic values of anti-DNase B and Antistreptolysin “O”(ASO) microtitration test in diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever with group A streptococcal(GAS) infection.Methods:Anti-DNase B antibodies of 77 patients with acute rheumatic fever(ARF) and 35 acute rheumatic heart disease(ARHD) patients with rheumatic activity ARHD were detected with anti-Dnase B microtitration test and ASO with rate scatter nephelometry test. 50 cases of normal persons were regarded as the control group.Results:The positive rate of ASO was 76.6% and the positive rate of anti-DNase B was 71.4% ,and There were no difference between them. The positive rate of either anti-DNase B and ASO detected jointly were 92.2%;There were significant differences in the positive rate between jointly and singly. The positive rate of anti-DNase B (85.7%) was significantly higher than that of ASO(54.3%) in ARHD, the positive rate of anti-DNase B and ASO were 91.4%, and significantly higher than that of ASO detected.Conclusion:Detecting jointly anti-DNase B and ASO should be of important value in the diagnosis of ARF.
作者 焦路阳
出处 《中国误诊学杂志》 CAS 2005年第4期628-629,共2页 Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics
关键词 抗DNA酶B 抗链“O” 风湿热 诊断 抗链球菌溶血素 Rheumatic fever/diagnosis Deoxyribonuclease Ⅰ/analysis Antistreptolysin/analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献13

  • 1余步云.风湿热的现状[J].中华内科杂志,1994,33(1):4-5. 被引量:9
  • 2胡治琦 全屏寿 王东元 等.急性风湿热321次的临床分析[J].中华内科杂志,1981,20:11-11.
  • 3余步云,中华内科杂志,1994年,33卷,4页
  • 4胡治琦,中华内科杂志,1981年,20卷,11页
  • 5孙冬红,刘永杰,于孟学,等主编.风湿科主治医师376问.第1版.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2000.42
  • 6陈灏珠,主编.实用内科学.风湿性疾病及骨关节病,概论.第10版.北京:人民出版社,1997.2065
  • 7张乃峥,主编.临床风湿病学.风湿性疾病总论.第1版.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1999.1,118,183,264,316
  • 8朱艳荣,白春洋,刘强,赵跃亭,赵喜元.胶乳法、溶血法、间接酶免法测定ASO的结果分析[J].中国实验诊断学,1998,2(3):158-158. 被引量:2
  • 9董太明,黄震东,吴红穗,陈剑光,陈志红,罗健,符永恒,苏健.抗DNA酶B在风湿热诊断中的应用[J].中华医学检验杂志,1999,22(2):98-100. 被引量:10
  • 10姚尔固.风湿病急症[J].医师进修杂志,2000,23(3):57-60. 被引量:2

共引文献17

同被引文献16

  • 1陈荣策,陈斌华,石胜.抗DNA酶B与ASO联合测定对小儿链球菌感染的诊断价值[J].实用医技杂志,2004,11(11B):2392-2393. 被引量:4
  • 2李剑民,杨建鑫.ADNS、ASO与CRP联合检测在急性风湿热诊断中的临床价值[J].实用医技杂志,2005,12(02A):324-325. 被引量:4
  • 3朱秀龙,陈海生,魏芝宝.应用抗DNA酶B诊断风湿热的临床评价[J].海南医学,2007,18(2):79-80. 被引量:2
  • 4AHA Writing Group. Guidelines of vheamatic fever:Jones criteria up- dated 1992 [ J ]. Circulation, 1993,87 ( 1 ) : 302 - 304.
  • 5Ferrievi P. immume respone to streptocoeal irffeetions. In: Rose NR, Fridmanand fahey JL, eds. manual of elimical luboratory immunology. Americansocity for Microbiology, Washington DC,1986,336-341.
  • 6George C. klein and Wallis L. Jones. Comparison of the streptozyme test with the antistreptolysim O, antideoxybonuclease B, and anthya- alurondase test[J]. Appl Microbiol, 21 (2) :257 -258.
  • 7American Heart Association Writing Group. Guidelines for the diag- nosis of rheumatic fever: Jones criteria updated 1992 [ J ]. Circula- tion, 1993,87 (6) : 302 - 303.
  • 8Sethi S, Kaushik K, Mohandas K, et al. Anti - streptolysin O tilers in normal healthy children of 5 - 15 years [ J ]. Lndian Pediatr, 2003,40( 11 ) :1068 - 1071.
  • 9Machado CS,Oritiz K, Martins Ade I,,et al. Antiustreptolysin 0 titer profile in acute rheumatic fever diagnosis [ J ]. J Pediatr, 2001,77 (2) :105 -111.
  • 10Carapetis JR,Currie BJ. Rheumatic fever in a high incidence popula- tion: importance of monoarthritis and low grade fever [ J ]. Arch Dis Child,2001,85 ( 3 ) :223 - 227.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部