摘要
目的 对比手法复位石膏托外固定及LCP锁定钢板在治疗老年骨质疏松性桡骨远端粉碎性骨折中的疗效差异。方法2002年8月至2003年8月间,共收治104例老年性骨质疏松性桡骨远端粉碎性骨折的病例,其中使用LCP内固定术治疗的21例,其余采取手法复位石膏托外固定。结果经过平均11.3个月得随访,手法复位组的优良率为68.7%,LCP组的优良率为90.5%。结论LCP锁定钢板在治疗老年骨质疏松性桡骨远端粉碎性骨折中具有显著的优越性。
Objective Compared the effectiveness of locking compression plate (LCP) in the treatment of senile osteoporotic comminuted fracture of distal end of radius with manual reduction and plaster immobilization. Methods Retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 104 senile patients with osteoporotic comminuted fracture of distal end of radius treated in our department from August 2002 to August 2003, of that 21 cases treated with LCP. Results Follow up duration was average 11.3 months, It showed the satisfactory ratio of functional outcome with LCP fixation was 91.6 percent, while the ratio is 65.3 percent in plaster group Conclusion LCP system showed distinct prevalence in treating senile osteoporotic Conclusion fracture of distal end of radius compared with traditional methods.of Distal end of Radius
出处
《生物骨科材料与临床研究》
CAS
2005年第2期7-9,共3页
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Materials and Clinical Study
