期刊文献+

芬太尼在机械通气新生儿中的临床评价 被引量:3

Clinical evaluation of fentanyl used in neonates' mechanical ventilation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较芬太尼和咪唑安定在新生儿机械通气中的镇静效能以及不良反应, 为新生儿机械通气选择理想的镇静剂提供理论依据。方法: 将40例需机械通气的新生儿随机分为芬太尼组(n=20) 和咪唑安定组(n=20), (1) 比较两组用药后30min、6h和12h机械通气参数(RR、PIP、FiO2、PEEP) 和患儿平均血压、心率; (2) 通过新生儿面部编码系统(NF CS) 评价两组患儿用药后30min、6h和12h的疼痛行为反应评分; ( 3 ) 比较两组患儿机械通气时间。结果: ( 1 ) 芬太尼组PIP、FiO2、PEEP在用药前和用药后各时段与咪唑安定组相比差异无显著意义(P>0 .05), 而用药后12hRR则低于咪唑安定组(37 .00±3 .77) 次/minVS(40. 00±5 .13) 次/min, P<0. 05; 咪唑安定组用药30min后出现血压下降, 6h后出现心率下降, 与用药前相比差异具有显著性(P<0 .05); 而芬太尼用药后各时段的HR和MBP与用药前相比无显著差异(P>0 .05);(2) 两组在用药后30min, 疼痛行为反应评分明显低于用药前组(P<0 .05), 但各时段两组间比较无显著差异(P>0 .05 );(3) 芬太尼组机械通气时间少于咪唑安定组(25. 35±12. 50) hVS(34 .90±17. 78)h, P<0 .05。结论: 与咪唑安定相比, 芬太尼能降低机械通气的通气频率、缩短机械通气时间, 且心血管的不良反应少。 Objective:To compare the effect and side effect of fentanyl and midazolam in neonates' mechanical ventilation to supply theory basis for selection of better sedative.Methods:40 ventilated neonates were randomly and averagely divided into fentanyl and midazolam group. ①The ventilatory parameters (RR, PIP, FiO 2 and PEEP) at 30 min, 6 and 12 h and average blood pressure and heart rate and the ventilation duration were compared, the pain behavior reaction scores at 30 min, 6 and 12 h of two groups were compared with Neonatal Facial Coding System. Results:①There were no significant difference in PIP, FiO 2 and PEEP before and after treatment between two groups at different periods ( P >0.05); RR at 12 h after treatment in fentanyl group 〔(37.00±3.77)/min〕 was lower than that in midazolam group〔 (40.00±5.13)/min〕( P <0.05); blood pressure decreased at 30 min and heart rate reduced at 6 h after treatment in midazolam group with significant difference comparing to those before treatment ( P <0.05); but there was no significant difference in HR and MBP before and after treatment in fentanyl group ( P >0.05); ②Pain behavior reaction scores in both groups at 30 min after treatment significantly decreased ( P <0.05), but without significant difference at different periods ( P >0.05); ③The ventilation duration in fentanyl group 〔(25.35±12.50)h〕 were lower than that in midazolam group 〔(34.90±17.78)h〕 ( P <0.05).Conclusion:Fentanyl could reduce ventilation frequency, shorten duration and with less side effects on cardiovascular system comparing to midazolam.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2005年第8期993-995,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词 芬太尼 咪唑安定 新生儿 机械通气 Fentanyl Midazolam Neonates Mechanical ventilation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Grunau RE, Oberlander T, Holsti Let al. Bedside application of the Neonatal Facial Coding System in pain assessment of premature neonates. Pain, 1998, 76:277.
  • 2McCollam JS, ONeil MG, Norcross ED et al. Continuous infusions of lorazepam, midazolam, and propofol for sedation of the critically ill surgery trauma patient: A prospective, randomized comparision. Crit Care Med, 1999, 27 (11): 2454.
  • 3解建.咪唑安定在机械通气中的应用[J].山东医药,2003,43(31):61-62. 被引量:32
  • 4潘国权,严纯雪,南向珍,何时军,单小鸥.咪唑安定在机械通气患儿中的临床应用及分析[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2003,18(3):187-188. 被引量:11
  • 5Elina Saarenman, Pirkko Huttunen, Jubani Leppaluoto et al. Advantages of fentanyl over morphine in analgesia for ventilated newborn infants after birth: A randomized trial J pediatr, 1999, 134 (2) : 144.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Ronan KP, Gallagher TJ, George B, et al. Comparison of propofol and midazolam for sedation in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med, 1995,23 - 539- 552.
  • 2Carrasco G, Molina R, Costa J, et al. Propofol vs midazolam in short-medium and long-term sedation of critically ill patients. Chest, 1993,103 : 557- 564.
  • 3Smith 1, White PF, Nathanson MH, et al. Propofol : an update on it's clinical use. Anesthesiology, 1994,80 - 1005.
  • 4Belier JP, Pottecher T, Lugnier A, et al. Prolonged sedation with propofol in 1CU patients: Recovery and blood concentration changes during periodic interruptions in infusion. Br J Anaesth,1988,61:583-588.
  • 5Roekaerts PM, Huygen FJ, de Lange S. Infusion of propofol versus midazolam for sedation in the intensive care unit following coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth , 1993,7(2):142-147.
  • 6Barrientos-Vega R, Sanchez-Soria MM, Morales-Garcia C, et al. Prolonged sedation of critically ill patients with midazolam or propofol :impact of weaning and costs. Crit Care Med , 1997,25 : 33-40.
  • 7Shelly MP,Sultan MA,Bodenham A,et al. Midazolam in fusions incritically ill patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 1991,8 : 21 - 27.
  • 8Ramsay MA, Savage TM, Simpson BR, et al. Controlled sedation with alphaxolone-alphadolone. BMJ, 1974,2 z 656- 659.

共引文献40

同被引文献82

  • 1金调芬,李文洲,潘文钦.不同体位足底采血对新生儿疼痛反应的影响[J].中华护理杂志,2005,40(2):114-115. 被引量:45
  • 2陈芳,张道珍.瑞芬太尼与芬太尼在新生儿麻醉中应用的比较[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2005,4(1):58-59. 被引量:3
  • 3韩国强,何时军.咪唑安定联用吗啡在小儿创伤机械通气时镇静镇痛作用的临床评价[J].中国小儿急救医学,2006,13(3):248-250. 被引量:3
  • 4Oei J,Hari R,Butha T,et al.Facilitation of neonatal nasotracheal intubation with premedication: a randomized controlled trial. J Paediatr Child Health, 2002,38(2) : 146-150.
  • 5Mitchell A, Boss BJ. Adverse effects of pain on the nervous systems of neoborns and young children: a review of the literature. J Neurosci Nurs, 2002,34(5) :228-236.
  • 6Vogel S, Gibbins S, Simmons B, et al. Premedication for endotracheal intubation (EI) in neonates: a Canadian perspective. Paediatr Res, 2000, 47(4) :438A.
  • 7Simon L, Trifa M, Mokhtari M, et al. Premedication for tracheal intubation: A prospective survey in 75 neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. Crit Care Med,2004,32(2) :565-568.
  • 8Sarkar S, Schumacher RE, Baumgart S, et al. Are newborns receiving premedication before elective intubation? J Perinatol, 2006, 26 (5) : 286- 289.
  • 9Andriessen P, Janssen BJ, Berendsen RC, et al. Cardiovascular autonomic regulation in preterm infants: the effect of atropine. Pediatr Res, 2004,56 (6) :939-946.
  • 10Barrington KJ, Byme PJ. Premedication for neonatal intubation. Am J Perinatol, 1998,15(4) :213-216.

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部