摘要
依据国际法,主权国家可以对危害国际社会共同利益的国际罪行行使普遍管辖权。但是,从以往的国际实践来看,这种间接管辖的方式效果不尽人意。特别是对某些特定的国际罪行,如战争罪,侵略罪,种族灭绝罪,危害人类罪等等。在国际刑事法院建立之后,这些国际人道法中的罪行在法定条件下可以由国际刑事法院直接管辖。国际刑事法院必须尊重国内法院的管辖权,并符合相应的条件。本文试图讨论2003年的美伊战争中是否存在违反国际人道法的行为,这些行为是否可成为国际刑事法院管辖的对象。
Under the current International Law,any country can assume jurisdiction on on international criroes according to domestic Criminal Law.However, this way to uttering international jurisdic tion was unsatisfied,especiallyin the range of some particular crimes.that is Genocide, Crimes against Humanity, War Crimes,Crimes of aggression and so on. The foundati on of ICC produced an alternative method.Under some circumstances,ICC wolld take solution against such crimes like Genocide,Crirmes against Humanity,and War Crimes,Crimes of aggression.This essay tries to interpret the crimes in the war which U.S.A brought upon lraq on Mar,2003 are Within the scope of International Humanitarian Law and Whet her 1CC have jurisdiction over them or not.
出处
《榆林学院学报》
2005年第1期52-55,59,共5页
Journal of Yulin University
关键词
国际法
刑事法院
ICC
美伊战争
普遍管辖权
国际人道法
罗马规约
International Criminal Court
ICC raq War
International jurisdiction international Humanitarian Law Rome Statute