期刊文献+

心电图门控和周围门控技术相位对比脉冲序列扫描的对比分析 被引量:2

Analysis of phase-contrast pulse sequence scanning with ECG trigger and PPU trigger
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨采用不同门控技术对相位对比脉冲序列扫描的影响。方法应用飞利浦公司产GyroscanNT1.5T磁共振成像仪,对21例正常健康志愿者的左肺动脉进行流动补偿相位对比脉冲序列扫描。其中15例采用心电图(ECG)门控技术,6例采用周围(PPU)门控技术。结果两种扫描方式均可重建出3种图像,即快速梯度回波解剖图(FFE/M)、相位模数图(PCA/M)和相位速度图(PCA/P),并由相位速度图获得左肺动脉的时间-速度模式图。采用PPU门控技术扫描测得左肺动脉的最大血流速度为80.6cm/s±17.3cm/s,左肺动脉平均速度为45.4cm/s±7.2cm/s;采用ECG门控技术获得的左肺动脉最大血流速度为82.0cm/s±12.8cm/s,平均速度为46.0cm/s±6.0cm/s。两者间无统计学差异。结论采用相位对比脉冲序列,加心电图门控方式获得的图像与心脏的心动周期相一致,而加周围门控方式获得图像的时相与前者相比有一段时间的延迟,但获得的左肺动脉血流速度最大值和平均值没有显著差别。 Objective To investigate the different effects of phase-contras t pulse sequence scanning with different cardiac trigger. Methods Twenty one heal thy volunteers underwent MRI scanning with flow compensation phase contrast pul se sequence at a Philips Gyroscan NT 1.5 T MR scanner.Among them,cardiac synchro nization was used with ECG trigger in 15 healthy volunteers and with PPU trigger in 6 healthy volunteers.Results FFE/M,PCA/M and PCA/P images were reconstructed ,and the time velocity profile was obtained by analysis of PCA/P image.The max imum blood flow velocity and mean velocity of left pulmonary artery(LPA)with PPU were 80.6±17.3(cm/s)and 45.4±7.2(cm/s);and with ECG they were 82.0±12.8(cm/s )and 46.0±6.0(cm/s)respectively.Conclusion Images obtained by phase contrast p ulse sequence scanning with ECG trigger are matched with heart cycles,however,im ages obtained by phase contrast pulse sequence scanning with PPU trigger are no t matched with heart cycles,there is a delay between them.
出处 《实用医学影像杂志》 2005年第2期67-68,共2页 Journal of Practical Medical Imaging
关键词 心电图门控 周围门控 左肺动脉 心动周期 Electrocardiography trigger Peripheral pulse trigger Left pulmo nary artery Heart cycle
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Pelsch R, Helmberger T, Scheidler J, et al. New techniques and pulse sequence in MRI of the liver[J]. Radiologe, 1999, 39(8):662 - 670.
  • 2Enzmann DR, Ross MR, Marks MP, et al. Blood fiow in major cerebral arteries measured by phase contrast cine MR[J]. Am J Neuroradiol, 1994, 15(1): 123 - 129.
  • 3Silwerman JM, Julien PJ, Herfkens RJ, et al. Quantitative differential pulmonary perfusion: MR imaging versus radionuclide lung scanning[J]. Radiology , 1993, 189(3):699- 701.

同被引文献20

  • 1朱晓黎,沈天真,陈星荣.脑血液流动磁共振定量技术的流体力学实验研究[J].放射学实践,2005,20(8):731-735. 被引量:1
  • 2李彩英,田建明,刘辉,陆建平,黄勃源,刘怀军.利用磁共振相位对比法对非搏动流体模型的定量测量研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(4):535-537. 被引量:10
  • 3[2]Ridgwy JP,Tumbull LW,Smith MA,et al.Demonstration of pulsatile cerebrospinal-fluid flow using magnetic resonance phase imaging[J].Br J Radiol,1987,60(713):423~427.
  • 4[3]Nordell B,Stahlberg F,Ericsson A,et al.A rotating phantom for the study of flow effects in MR imaging[J].Magn Reson Imaging,1988,6(6):695~705.
  • 5[4]Powell AJ,Maier SE,Chung T,et al.Phase-velocity cine magnetic resonance imaging measurement ofpulsatile blood flow in children and young adults:in vitro and in vivo validatiom[J].Pediatr Cardiol,2000,21(2):104~110.
  • 6[7]James E,Moore Jr,David N,et al.Pulsatile vevlcity measurements in a modle ofthe human abdominal aorta under resting condions[J].Biomechanical Engineering,1994,116:337~348.
  • 7[8]Tang C,Blatter DD,Parker PJ.Accuracy of phase contrast flow measuremeats in the presence ofpartial-volume effects[J].Magn Reson Imanging,1993,3:377~385.
  • 8[9]Yang GZ,Burgerp,KilnerPJ,et al.Dynamic range extension of cine velocity mersurements using motion-registered spationtemporal phase unwrapping[J].Magn Resort Imaging,1996,6:495~499.
  • 9杨广夫,姚晓群,何斌,刘建军,李金柱,韩博,闫新成,薛彤霄,杨小军,刘晖,张保其,张文奎,富宪民.MR流量测定面积的实验研究[J].现代医用影像学,2007,16(4):145-147. 被引量:1
  • 10刘辉,梁长虹.相位对比磁共振血流测量原理、影响因素及在心血管疾病中的应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2009,25(12):2309-2311. 被引量:7

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部