期刊文献+

业务流程再造:对劳动分工理论的否定? 被引量:2

Business Process Reengineering:Deos It Negate the Theory of the Division of Labor?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 劳动分工理论是现代经济学和管理学的基石,基于分工理论建立起来的职能组织结构是一种纵向的金字塔式结构,而业务流程再造(BPR)则旨在打破职能部门之间的界限,建立以客户为导向的横向组织形式。对于业务流程再造理论是否否定了劳动分工理论这一深层次问题,答案应是否定的。分工理论并没有过时,但是分工在组织中的表现、分工的形式、合理分工程度等发生了变化。 The theory of the division of labor is the foundation of modern economics and management. Functional structure that is set up according to the theory of the division of labor is a hierarchical organizational structure like a pyramid, and BPR aims at breaking the boundary of the functional structure and establishing customeroriented and lateral form of organization. Does BPR negate the theory of the division of labor? No. The theory of the division of labor is not out of date, but the division of labor in modern organizations takes different forms and labor is divided in different degrees.
作者 钟耕深 李飞
出处 《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2005年第3期129-133,共5页 Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 业务流程再造 分工 职能组织结构 business process reengineering division of labor functional structure of organization
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1迈克尔·波特.竞争优势[M].北京:华夏出版社,1998..
  • 2亚当·斯密.国富论[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,2001..
  • 3Michael Hammer, Reengineering Work:don't automate, obliterate.Havard Business Review, Jul/Aug, 1990.104.
  • 4Michael Hammer and James Champy, Reengineering the Corporation:A Manifesto for Business Revolution.HarperCollins Publishers Inc.New York, 1993.
  • 5[英]MalcolmWarner.国际工商管理百科全书(第2版, 英文版)[M].清华大学出版社,2003.PP681-689.
  • 6StephenP.Robbins and Mary Coulter, Management, 7thed.Prentice Hall, Inc.2002.
  • 7Joe Peppard and Philip Rowland, The essence of business process re-engineering.Prentice Hall Europe, 1995.9.

共引文献73

同被引文献24

  • 1刘峰,王兵.什么决定了利润差异:会计准则还是职业判断?——来自中国A、B股市场的初步证据[J].会计研究,2006(3):25-33. 被引量:46
  • 2蔡春,鲜文铎.会计师事务所行业专长与审计质量相关性的检验——来自中国上市公司审计市场的经验证据[J].会计研究,2007(6):41-47. 被引量:217
  • 3Krishnan G V. Did houston clients of arthur andersen recognize publicly available bad news in a timely fashion? [J]. Contem- porary Accounting Research, 2005, 22(1) : 165- 193.
  • 4Fuerman R D. Comparing the auditor quality of arthur andersen to that of the big 4[J]. Accounting and the Public Interest, 2006, 6(1): 135-161.
  • 5Francis J R, Michas P N. The contagion effect of low-quality audits[J]. The Accounting Review, 2012, 88(2): 521-552.
  • 6Mayhew B W, Wilkins M S. Audit firm industry specialization as a differentiation strategy:evidence from fees charged to firms going public[J]. Auditing: A Journal of Practice ~ Theory, 2003, 22(2): 33-52.
  • 7Krishnan G V. Does big 6 auditor industry expertise constrain earnings management? [J]. Accounting Horizons, 2003, 17 (1): 1-16.
  • 8Balsam S, Krishnan J, Yang J S. Auditor industry specializa- tion and earnings quality[J]. Auditing: A Journal of Practice Theory, 2003, 22(2): 71-97.
  • 9Dunn K A, Mayhew B W. Audit firm industry specialization and client disclosure quality[J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2004, 9(1).. 35-58.
  • 10Eisenberg T, Macey J R. Was arthur andersen different? an empirical examination of major accounting firm audits of large clients[J]. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2004, 1 (2) .. 263 -300.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部