摘要
人类学视野下的村落研究所引起的争议,促使人类学者不断地反省和思考人类学田野研究的理论和方法。“回访”与“超越”是两种不同的研究路径,也是对人类学田野研究的有益省思。“回访”不仅仅是延伸了先驱者作品的学术生命和意义,更重要的是对过程中的社区进行新知识基础上的再诠释。而“超越”所展现的学术意义则不仅仅在于努力赋予人类学视野下村落研究的合法性,还在于在超越中使其得到持续发展。
The controversies over the anthropological village studies urge anthropologists to continuously reflect on the theories and methods of anthropological fieldwork. “Revisit” and “transcendence” are two different research approaches with their own beneficial traits. “Revisit” not only extends the academic life and significance of the works of the predecessors but also reinterprets the community under investigation in a new light. “Transcendence” has its academic significance revealed in the legality of the anthropological village studies and a sustainable development in this process.
出处
《思想战线》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第3期42-45,共4页
Thinking
关键词
村落研究
田野研究
回访
超越
village studies
fieldwork
revisit
transcendence
