期刊文献+

MAKING AND VALIDATING COMPLEX DECISIONS WITH THE AHP/ANP 被引量:41

MAKING AND VALIDATING COMPLEX DECISIONS WITH THE AHP/ANP
原文传递
导出
摘要 Several examples that serve to validate the AHP/ANP with matrices hierarchies and networks are given in this paper. They are then followed by a discussion of the real numbers and how they are generated without the need for an absolute zero, and how they define an absolute scale of measurement that also does not need an absolute zero. In the AHP/ANP the measurement of an alternative depends on what other alternatives it is compared with. The result is that rank can change if alternatives are added or deleted, something that does not occur in one-at-a-time rating of the alternatives by comparing them with an ideal. An example is provided to show that this is natural and need not involve new criteria or change in judgments. A brief discussion of Utility Theory, the other multi-criteria theory, which uses interval scales to measure intangibles and some of its problems and paradoxes, is given. The references at the end include most of the papers that are adverse to the AHP with brief comments about several of them given in the paper. Several examples that serve to validate the AHP/ANP with matrices hierarchies and networks are given in this paper. They are then followed by a discussion of the real numbers and how they are generated without the need for an absolute zero, and how they define an absolute scale of measurement that also does not need an absolute zero. In the AHP/ANP the measurement of an alternative depends on what other alternatives it is compared with. The result is that rank can change if alternatives are added or deleted, something that does not occur in one-at-a-time rating of the alternatives by comparing them with an ideal. An example is provided to show that this is natural and need not involve new criteria or change in judgments. A brief discussion of Utility Theory, the other multi-criteria theory, which uses interval scales to measure intangibles and some of its problems and paradoxes, is given. The references at the end include most of the papers that are adverse to the AHP with brief comments about several of them given in the paper.
出处 《Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering》 SCIE EI CSCD 2005年第1期1-36,共36页 系统科学与系统工程学报(英文版)
关键词 Analytic hierarchy and network processes VALIDATION INPUT-OUTPUT utility theory paradoxes RANK comments and criticisms Analytic hierarchy and network processes, validation, input-output, utility theory paradoxes, rank, comments and criticisms
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

  • 1[1]Barzilai, J., "On the decomposition of value functions", Operations Research Letters,Vol. 22, pp159-170, 1998a.
  • 2[2]Barzilai, J., "Consistency measures for pairwise comparison matrices", Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 7,pp1232-132, 1998b.
  • 3[3]Barzilai, J. and F. A. Lootsma, "Power relations and group aggregation in the multiplicative ahp and smart", Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 6,pp155-165, 1997.
  • 4[4]Belton, V. and A. E. Gear, "On a short-coming of saaty's method of analytic hierarchies," Omega, Vol. 11, No. 3,pp228-230, 1983.
  • 5[5]Belton, V. and A. E. Gear, "The legitimacy of rank reversal - a comment", Omega, Vol.13, No. 3, pp143-144, 1985.
  • 6[6]Beynon, M. J., "An investigation of the role of scale values in the ds/ahp method of multi-criteria decision making", Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 11,pp327-343, 2002.
  • 7[7]Blair, A., R. Nachtmann, J. Olson, and T.Saaty, "Forecasting foreign exchange rates:an expert judgment approach",Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 21,No. 6, pp363-369,1987.
  • 8[8]Corbin, R., and A.A.J. Marley, "Random utility models with equality: an apparent,but not actual, generalization of random utility models", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 11, pp274-293, 1974.
  • 9[9]Costa, C. A. B. e. and J.-C. Vansnick, "A fundamental criticism to Saaty's use of the eigenvalue procedure to derive priorities",The London School of Economics and Political Science, Working Paper: LSEOR 01.42, 2001.
  • 10[10]Dantzig T., Number the Language of Science, the Macmillan Company, 1954.

同被引文献308

引证文献41

二级引证文献257

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部