刑法因果关系的客观归责解说

Explanation of Objective Imputation in the Causation of the Criminal Law

刑法因果关系问题是刑法理论中一个重要的问题,也是一个充满了争议的领域。刑法因果关系在刑法理 论和实践中都具有很重要的意义。长期以来,两大法系学者均对该课题进行了大量研究,并提出了各种不同观点 与主张,但至今尚未形成一个占绝对权威地位的通说。本文试图通过对两大法系因果关系理论的梳理,依次检讨 近因说、法规目的说、commonsense因果关系法则、条件说、原因说、相当因果关系说的得失,在此基础上论述客观 归责的相关内容,提出借鉴客观归责理论解说因果关系的思路。

The Causation of the criminal law plays a significant role in both criminal law theory and practice. For a long time, many researches have been done by scholars of the Anglo and the Continental law systems about the subject matter, and many different views and opinions have arisen, which have not formed and absolutely authoritative theory. In this paper, the Proximate Cause and common sense theory, the Condition theory, Causation theory, theories of the merits and demerits of the merits and demerits and the objective Imputation are expounded consequently. We will discusses the fundamental content of the objektike Zurechnung, with the transplant of which to cast off the difficult position of causation. In order to solve the practical problem.