期刊文献+

论有效的课堂讨论 被引量:26

On Effective Classroom Discussion
原文传递
导出
摘要 课堂讨论是师生之间、学生之间就某一问题相互交换观点和看法,并针对问题的某些方面进行争论和辩解,最终达到共同理解以及求同存异。其心理机制是个体知识建构过程和合作性联合建构过程。有效的课堂讨论应是以互动为前提、以严谨的思维为基础、以可靠的知识为保障,因此,教师和学生在讨论中负有维护讨论团体、维护严谨思维、维护准确可信的知识的责任,并且依据讨论团体的形式和成熟度而变化。
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第5期56-59,共4页 Global Education
基金 全国教育科学"十五"规划教育部重点课题"二十一世纪初我国教育心理学的改革与发展研究--从认知革命到社会文化革命的理论与实践"的一部分。
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1StephenD Brookfieid StephenPreakill著 罗静楮保堂译.讨论式教学法—实现民主课堂的方法和技巧[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2002-8..
  • 2汪航.合作学习认知研究综述[J].心理科学,2004,27(2):438-440. 被引量:25
  • 3Ann L. Brown& Annemarie S. Palincaar, Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition, Knowing, learning and instruction: easays in honor of Robert Glaser, Hildar, NJ: Edbaum, 393 - 494.
  • 4L. Resnick, Accountable Talk: Classroom Conversation that Works . 2002.9.
  • 5J. S. Brown, A. Collins & P. Duguid, Cognition and the culture of learning, Educational Researcher, 1996.18(1) :32 - 42.
  • 6加里D 鲍里奇(美)著.有效教学方法(第四版)[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2002.283-285.

二级参考文献23

  • 1Alexopoulou, E., & Driver,R. Small-group discussion in physics:Peer interaction modes in pairs mad fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1996,33 (10) : 1099 - 1114.
  • 2Pirolli, P , & Reeker, M. Learning strategies and transfer in the domain of programming. Cognition and Instruction, 1994, 12 ( 3 ) :235 - 275.
  • 3Kneser, C , & Ploetzner, R. Collaboration on the basis of complementary.domain knowledge:Observed dialogue structures and their relatioh to learning success. Learning and Instruction, 2001,11:53-83 .
  • 4Stasser, G ,Taylor, L A , & Hanna, C. Information sampling in structured mad unstructured discussions of three-and six-person groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989,57( 1 ) :67 - 78.
  • 5Anderson, J R. The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University press, 1983.
  • 6Lave, Jean, & Wenger, Etienne. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral articipation ( Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1991.
  • 7Palincsar, A S. Perspectives on teaching and learning. Annua Review of Psychology, 1998,49 : 345 - 375.
  • 8Fiore, S M. Problem space and problem solving failure: Cognitive mechanisms in the explanation of process loss in group problem solving, doctoral dissertation, university of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh:PA, 2000.
  • 9Azmitia, M , & Crowley, K. The rhythms of scientific thinking: A study of collaboration in anearthquake microworld. In K. Crowley &C D Schum & T Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications for everyday, classroom, and professional settings. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum. 2001 : 47 - 77.
  • 10Voss, J F. On the representation of problems: An informationprocessing approach to foreign policy decision making. In D A Sylvan & J F. Voss(Eds. ), Problem representation in foreign policy decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 : 8 -25.

共引文献24

同被引文献67

引证文献26

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部