摘要
目的:探讨腹腔镜胆道探查取石,T管引流术和腹腔镜胆囊切除一期联合内镜Oddi括约肌切开取石治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石的临床应用价值。方法:统计分析研究组(77例腹腔镜胆道探查取石即LCH- TD及43例腹腔镜胆囊切除一期联合内镜Oddi括约肌切开取石即LC- EST)与对照组(60例常规开腹胆总管探查即OCHTD)胆总管结石合并胆囊结石患者的临床资料。结果:研究组胆总管结石合并胆囊结石120例中111例行微创手术取得成功,占92. 5%,与对照开腹探查组相比,术后恢复较好,住院时间短,取得了较满意的效果(P<0 .05);研究组中运用LCH -TD的患者较LC EST的患者手术操作时间、术后腹痛、恶心及住院天数差异有显著性(P<0. 05)。两者在胆总管内径及结石大小方面差异亦有显著性(P<0. 05)。结论:LCH -TD与LC -EST两种术式微创,安全且临床疗效可靠,能代替大部分开腹胆总管探查术;腹腔镜胆总管探查取石法总体上优于腹腔镜胆囊切除一期联合内镜Oddi括约肌切开取石法。胆总管直径>1 0cm者行LCH- TD是一种安全可行的方法。若胆总管内径<1cm,且胆总管结石<1 0cm,建议行LC- EST。
Objective:To evaluate the clinical values of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy Ttube drainage (LCHTD) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy with endoscopic sphincterotomy (LCEST) on patients with common bile duct stones.Methods:A total of 180 cases were studied,of which,77 cases received LCHTD,43 cases received LCEST and 60 cases received open choledocholithotomy Ttube drainage (OCHTD),respectively.Results:The microinvasive operation, LCHTD or LCEST,were performed successfully on 92 5%(111/120) of the patients,and they were superior to traditional OCHTD significantly. There were meaningful differences between LCHTD and LCEST on operating time,postoperative complications,and hospitalization time.However,the indications for LCHTD and LCEST were different, for instance,on diameters of common bile duct and sizes of stones.Conclusions:Both LCHTD and LCEST are safe,microinvasive and suitable for patients with common bile duct stones.Moreover, LCHTD is better than LCEST in terms of clinical therapeutic values. Prospecting from our research LCHTD and LCEST can replace most traditional OCHTD in the future.
出处
《腹腔镜外科杂志》
2005年第2期82-85,共4页
Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery