法律解释的悖论与法律论证——一个终结还是开始?

The paradox of legal hermeneutics and legal argumentation

法律解释学展开的思维基点主要有两种:一是难题思维;二是整体或类型思维,也可以称为大全思维。但因为其共同具有的主体性思维特点,产生了法律解释的难题。法律论证理论正是通过主体间性思维取代主体性思维,进一步发展了法律解释学。

Legal argumentation is a new subject of legal theory that sprang up gradually in Europe-continent law system since the 1960's. We arranged the accomplishment of legal hermeneutics and the theoretical paradox that it meet, and pointed out the advancement of legal interpretation was the starting point of legal argumentation. There were mainly two problems: first, law needs to be interpreted; second, legal interpretation has meet theoretical paradox. Under this background, legal argumentation made a new try in theory.