论悬赏广告的法律性质及效力

On the Legal Nature and Efficiency of Reward Advertisements

悬赏广告的法律性质是一个在法学界争论激烈、尚无定论的问题,学界主要有契约说和单方行为说两种主张。在借鉴、比较国外相关规定和学说的基础上,认为单方行为说较之于契约说而言,更具合理性。同时,提出在我国立法上应承认悬赏广告的法律效力。

The legal nature of reward advertisements is an contradictive issue with no final verdict in law field. There are mainly two allegations in law field: contract doctrine and unilateral act doctrine By referring to and comparing the related information abroad, this paper believes that unilateral act doctrine is more rational than contract doctrine, and the legal efficiency of reward advertisements should be admitted in the legislation in our country.