期刊文献+

胃食管反流病与食管癌相关性研究进展 被引量:2

Progress of Correlation Between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Esophageal Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨反流性食管炎Barrett食管、食管癌相关性的新进展。方法:阅读、研究国内外有关文献并进行综述。结果:胃食管反流增加了对食道黏膜的损伤,增加了食道癌的危险。抗HP治疗可以降低反流性食管炎的发病率,同时HP也可能保护黏膜使胃食管不患胃食管反流病(GERD)、Barrett食管和食管癌。结论:GERD增加食管癌的危险,抗HP治疗与GERD及食管癌的关系尚无定论。 Objective:To study the new progress of c or relation among reflux esophagitis,Barrett esophagus and esophageal carcinoma. Methods:Reading related literatures home and abroad and summarizing them.Results:Gastroesophageal reflux aggravated mucosal defect of esophagus and increased the risk of esophageal carcinoma.Anti-helicobacter p ylori (Hp) treatment could decrease the incidence of reflux esophagitis,and prot ect the gastroesophageal mucosa from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD),Bar rette seophagus and esophageal carcinoma.Conclusion:GERD incr eas es the risk of esophageal carcinoma.The relationship between anti-Hp treatment a nd GERD or esophageal carcinoma is not confirmed.
出处 《内蒙古医学杂志》 2005年第4期345-347,共3页 Inner Mongolia Medical Journal
关键词 胃食管反流病 BARRETT食管 食管癌 研究进展 Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) Bar rett esophagus Esophageal carcinoma Progress
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献74

  • 1高萍,许国铭,邹多武.50名正常中国成人食管24小时pH监测结果分析[J].中华消化杂志,1996,16(1):32-34. 被引量:103
  • 2柯美云 潘国宗 等.胃食管反流病.现代胃肠病学(上册,第一版)[M].北京:科学出版社,1994.729-739.
  • 3[1]Spechler SJ,Robbins HB,et al.Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus[J].An overrated risk?Gastroenterology 1998,87∶927-933.
  • 4[2]Miros.M,Kerlin.P.Only patients with dysplasia progress to adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus[J].Gut,1991,32∶1441-1446.
  • 5[3]Blot,WJ,Devesa SS.Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia[J].J Am Med Assoc.1991,265∶1287-1289.
  • 6[4]Silverberg Boring CC.Cancer statistics[J].CA Cancer J Clin.1990,40∶9-27.
  • 7[5]Jankowski J,Wright N,et al.Molecular evolution of the metaplasia dysplasia adenocarcinoma sequence in the esophagus[J].AM J Pathol.1999,154∶965-973.
  • 8[6]Brian J,Carissa A,et al.Barrett's esophagus:cell cycle abnormalities in advancing stages of neoplastic pogression[J].Gasreoenterology.1993,105∶119-129.
  • 9[7]Brito MJ,Filipe MI.Association of transforming growth factor alpha and its precursors with malignant change in Barrett's epithelium:Biological and clinical variables[J].Int J Cancer.1995,00∶27-32.
  • 10[8]Janusz A.Jankowski,NickA.Wright.Molecular evolution of the metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence in the esophagus[J].Am.J.of Pathology.1999,154∶965-973.

共引文献845

同被引文献22

  • 1Gyula Mózsik,Gy(o|¨)rgy Rumi,András D(o|¨)m(o|¨)t(o|¨)r,Mária Figler,Beáta Gasztonyi,El(?)d Papp,Alajos Pár,Gabriella Pár,József Belágyi,Zoltán Matus,Béla Melegh.Involvement of serum retinoids and Leiden mutation in patients with esophageal, gastric, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers in Hungary[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(48):7646-7650. 被引量:2
  • 2吴库生,李克,于萍.营养素与消化道肿瘤关系的研究进展[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(11):870-874. 被引量:10
  • 3丁雯瑾,孙丹凤,房静远.生物活性食物成份与消化系肿瘤[J].世界华人消化杂志,2006,14(15):1502-1506. 被引量:1
  • 4林三仁,许国铭,胡品津,周丽雅,陈旻湖,柯美云,袁耀宗,房殿春,萧树东.中国胃食管反流病共识意见[J].胃肠病学,2007,12(4):233-239. 被引量:528
  • 5崔金环,杨光.人乳头瘤病毒与食管鳞癌的关系[J].肿瘤防治研究,2007,34(6):468-471. 被引量:1
  • 6Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, et al. Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol, 2006, 101 (8): 1900-1920.
  • 7Hirano I, Richter JE; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing. Am J Gastroenterol, 2007, 102 (3): 668-685.
  • 8DeVault KR, Castell DO; American College of Gastroenterology. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol, 2005, 100 (1): 190-200.
  • 9Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut, 1999, 45 (2): 172-180.
  • 10Pandolfino JE, Schreiner MA, Lee TJ, et al. Comparison of the Bravo wireless and Digitrapper catheter-based pH monitoring systems for measuring esophageal acid exposure. Am J Gastroenterol, 2005, 100 (7): 1466-1476.

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部