期刊文献+

组织公平性——薪酬管理工作的重要原则 被引量:5

Organizational Justice: an Important Principle of Emolument Management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,我国旅游业从高薪行业转变为相对低薪行业。许多旅游企业员工因工资收入低、缺乏发展机会等原因而跳槽或改行。如何做好员工薪酬管理,稳定员工队伍,是许多旅游企业管理人员面临的一项重要的工作。旅游企业的薪酬管理决策结果、决策程序、管理人员对待员工的态度和方式都会影响员工的薪酬公平感。本文根据组织公平性理论,探讨程序公平性和交往公平性对员工薪酬公平感和满意感的重要影响,并为企业管理人员加强薪酬管理工作提供一些建议。 In recent years, China's tourism industry has witnessed a decline of e molument. Many a tourist enterprises are suffering from a high rate of employee turnover due to low payment and a lack of opportunities for personal development . Therefore, how to improve emolument management to retain their employees is an essential task the managements of many tourist enterprises face. The authors ar gue that the process and outcome of emolument managerial decisions, as well as i nterpersonal interactions between management and employees, affect employee's pe rceived fairness. This paper applies organizational justice theory to probe into the impact of procedural and interactive justice on employee's perceived fairne ss and pay satisfaction, and proposes some suggestions for improving emolument m anagement in tourism industry.
出处 《旅游科学》 CSSCI 2005年第2期6-9,42,共5页 Tourism Science
关键词 薪酬 组织公平性 结果公平性 程序公平性 交往公平性 emolument organizational justice fairness of outcome justice throu gh out the whole process equality of interaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Colquitt, Jason. A., Donald E. Conlon, Michael J. Wesson, Christopher O. L. H. Porter and K. Yee Ng. Justice at the Millennium:A Meta-analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research[ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(3): P425-445
  • 2Newman, Jerry M., and, George T. Milkovich. Procedural Justice Challenges in Compensation: Eliminating the Fairness Gap [ J]. Labor Law Journal, August 1990. P575-580.
  • 3Shapiro, Debra L., E. Holly Butmer, and Bruce Barry. Explanations: What Factors Enhance their Perceived Adequacy[J]. Organizational Behavior and Hunan Decision Processes, 1994, 58(3): P346-368.
  • 4Adams, J. Stacy. Inequity in Social Exchange[ A]. Berkowitz, Lenard. Advance in Experimental Social Psychology[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1965: 267-289.
  • 5Leventhal, Gerald S. What should be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to Study of Fairness in Social Relationships[ A]. Gergen,Kenneth J., Martin B. Greenberg, and Richard H. Wills. Social Exchange: Advance in Theory and Research[ M]. New York: Plenum,1980: P27-55.
  • 6Wallace, Marc J., and Fay, Charles H. Compensation Tneory and Practice[M]. Boston: Kent Publishing Co., 1988.
  • 7Bies, Robert J. Identifying Principles of Interactional Justice: The Case of Corporate Recruiting[ A]. Bies, Robert J. Moving Beyond Equity Theory: The New Directions in Research on Justice in Organizations[R]. Chicago, 1986.
  • 8Bies, Robert J. Interactional ( In)justice: The Sacred and the Profane[ A]. Greenberg, Jerald, and Russell Cropanzano. Advances in Organizational Justice[M]. California: Stanford University Press, 2001: P89-118.
  • 9Ramaswami, Stridhar N., and Jagdip Singh. Antecedents and Consequences of Merit Pay Fairness for Industrial Salespeople[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2003, 67(4): P46-66.
  • 10Greenberg, Jerald. Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow[J]. Journal of Management, 1990, 16(2): P399-432.

同被引文献66

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部