期刊文献+

Comparisons of Maximum Likelihood Estimates and Bayesian Estimates for the Discretized Discovery Process Model

Comparisons of Maximum Likelihood Estimates and Bayesian Estimates for the Discretized Discovery Process Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 A Bayesian approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms has been developed to analyze Smith’s discretized version of the discovery process model. It avoids the problems involved in the maximum likelihood method by effectively making use of the information from the prior distribution and that from the discovery sequence according to posterior probabilities. All statistical inferences about the parameters of the model and total resources can be quantified by drawing samples directly from the joint posterior distribution. In addition, statistical errors of the samples can be easily assessed and the convergence properties can be monitored during the sampling. Because the information contained in a discovery sequence is not enough to estimate all parameters, especially the number of fields, geologically justified prior information is crucial to the estimation. The Bayesian approach allows the analyst to specify his subjective estimates of the required parameters and his degree of uncertainty about the estimates in a clearly identified fashion throughout the analysis. As an example, this approach is applied to the same data of the North Sea on which Smith demonstrated his maximum likelihood method. For this case, the Bayesian approach has really improved the overly pessimistic results and downward bias of the maximum likelihood procedure. A Bayesian approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms has been developed to analyze Smith’s discretized version of the discovery process model. It avoids the problems involved in the maximum likelihood method by effectively making use of the information from the prior distribution and that from the discovery sequence according to posterior probabilities. All statistical inferences about the parameters of the model and total resources can be quantified by drawing samples directly from the joint posterior distribution. In addition, statistical errors of the samples can be easily assessed and the convergence properties can be monitored during the sampling. Because the information contained in a discovery sequence is not enough to estimate all parameters, especially the number of fields, geologically justified prior information is crucial to the estimation. The Bayesian approach allows the analyst to specify his subjective estimates of the required parameters and his degree of uncertainty about the estimates in a clearly identified fashion throughout the analysis. As an example, this approach is applied to the same data of the North Sea on which Smith demonstrated his maximum likelihood method. For this case, the Bayesian approach has really improved the overly pessimistic results and downward bias of the maximum likelihood procedure.
出处 《Petroleum Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第2期45-56,共12页 石油科学(英文版)
关键词 Bayesian estimate maximum likelihood estimate discovery process model Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) North Sea Bayesian estimate, maximum likelihood estimate, discovery process model, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), North Sea
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1J. David Fuller,F. Wang.A probabilistic model of petroleum discovery[J].Nonrenewable Resources.1993(4)
  • 2Lawrence D. Stone.Bayesian estimation of undiscovered pool sizes using the discovery record[J].Mathematical Geology.1990(3)
  • 3P. J. Lee,P. C. C. Wang.Prediction of oil or gas pool sizes when discovery record is available[J].Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology.1985(2)
  • 4James L. Smith,Geoffrey L. Ward.Maximum likelihood estimates of the size distribution of North Sea oil fields[J].Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology.1981(5)

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部