期刊文献+

基于核糖体DNA大亚基片断序列探讨中国东海海域赤潮原甲藻的分子分类 被引量:11

Identification of Prorocentrum donghaiense in Genus Prorocentrum from the East China Sea Based on Partial LSU rDNA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用PCR扩增技术对分类上有争议的中国东海赤潮原因种(被称为东海原甲藻,本文简称:东海株系)的基因组DNA进行了核糖体DNA大亚基片断(LSU rDNA)的扩增和测序,并与一同扩增的来自美国CCMP的被称为具齿原甲藻(本文简称:CCMP株系)的同源序列进行分析比较.结果表明,两者710 bp的LSU rDNA同源序列中仅存在7个碱基的差异,遗传相似度高达99.01%,遗传差异为0.99%.进一步与Genebank其他3种原甲藻即P.mexicanum、P.micans和P.minimum的同源序列进行比较,发现其他3种原甲藻两两间的种间遗传相似度在91.1%~95.5%之间,而P.micans和P.minimum种内不同株系的遗传相似度为99.4%~99.9%,均为99%以上.综合这些数据说明东海株系与CCMP株系之间的0.99%的遗传差异应视为种内差异,原甲藻的东海株系与CCMP株系当属异名同种.因此本试验结果从分子水平支持了被称为东海原甲藻的原甲藻与被称为具齿原甲藻(P.dentatum)的原甲藻同为一种的观点. The redtide causative organism Prorocentrum donghaiense from the East China Sea (Donghai strain) and P.dentatum from Culture Center of Marine Phytoplankton(CCMP) were analyzed by amplifying and sequencing the part of region of the large-subunit ribosomal DNA gene(LSU rDNA).The results showed that of 710 base pairs(bp) within LSU rDNA,only 5 bps were different between them.Both strains showed 99.01% genetic homology and 0.99% genetic differences.At the same time,the homologous sequences of another three species(P.mexicanum,P.micans,P.minimum) in genus Prorocentrum were downloaded from Genbank and analyzed by software.There were 99.4%~99.9% (up to 99.0%) homology between different strains within specie,and 91.1%~95.5% homology between different species in genus Prorocentrum.It was suggested that the genetic differences between Donghai strain and CCMP strain (0.99%) should be considered as variation within species,and Donghai strain and CCMP strain should be the same morphotype.This study supported the conclusion that Donghai strain and CCMP strain is actually the same species based on molecular data.
出处 《厦门大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第3期437-440,共4页 Journal of Xiamen University:Natural Science
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(2001CB409701) 中国科学院海洋研究所海洋生态与环境科学重点实验室开放课题
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1Steidinger KA and Tangen K. I997. Dinoflagellates. In: Tomas CRed. Identifying Marine Phytoplankton. San Diego: Academic Press.419-423.
  • 2Stein F. I883. Der Organismus der Infu-sionsthiere nach Eigenen Forschungen in Systematischer Reihenfoige bearbeltet Ⅲ. Die Naturgeschichte der Arthrodelen Flagellaten. Leipzig: Wilhelm Enlgelmann. 1 - 30.
  • 3Throndsen J. 1983. Ultra-and Nanoplankton Flagellates from Coastal Waters of Southern Honshu and Kyushu, Japan( including some results from the western part of the Kuroshio off Honshu).Working Party on Taxonomy in the Akashiwo Mondai Kenkyukai Fishing Ground Preservation Division, Research Department, Fisheries Agency, Japan. 212.
  • 4Dodge JD. 1975. The Prorocentrales(Dinophyceae) II. Revision of the taxonomy within the genus Prorocentrum. Bot J Linn Soc, 70:103-125.
  • 5Dodge JD. 1982. Marine Dinoflagellates of the British Isles. London: Her Majesty' s Stationary Office. 34.
  • 6Fukuyo Y, Takano H, Chihara M and Matanoka K. 1990. Red Tide Organisms in Japan--An Illustrated Taxonomic Guide. Tokyo: Uchida Rokakuho. 26 ~ 27.
  • 7Lebour MV. 1925. The Dinoflagellates of the Northern Seas. Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Plymouth,UK. 15-16.
  • 8Lu D-D and Goebel J. 2001. Five red tide species in genus Prorocentrum including the description of Prorocentrum donghaiense Lu sp. nov. from the East China Sea. Chin J Oceanog Limnol(海洋与湖沼), 19(4):337-344(in Chinese).
  • 9Schiller J. 1933. Dinoflagellate (Perldineae)in monographischer behandlung I. Tell. In: Kolkwitz Red. Dr. L. Rabenhorst ' s Kryptogamen-Flora yon Deutschland, Osterreich und Der Schweiz. Leipzig:Akademische Verlagsgesellsehaft. 40 ~ 41.
  • 10Dodge,J. D.Thecal fine-structure in the dinoflagellate generaProrocentrum andExuviaella[].Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK.1965

共引文献66

同被引文献224

引证文献11

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部