期刊文献+

两汉忠君观念之比较

Comparison of loyalty between two Han Dynasties
下载PDF
导出
摘要 两汉统治者都有意识地注重对大臣们进行忠君理论的宣传和灌输,但由于宣传的力度不同,收到的效果也不一样。西汉紧张的君臣关系大大削弱了大臣们对皇朝效忠的决心,以至于王莽轻易代汉;而东汉在宦官和外戚专权的危难之际,却有很多忠臣勇于赴汤蹈火,为皇朝的延续作出巨大的贡献。 Han Dynasty further strengthened the centralized power of the feudalism following the Qin Dynasty. The ruler of Han Dynasty paid more attention to instilling the theory of loyalty into their ministers' head . But the difference of degree affected the result. In West Han Dynasty, the nervous relationship between the emperor and the ministers weakened the degree of ministers', so that Wang Mang usurped the throne easily. But in East Han Dynasty, when the eunuch controlled the power, many loyalty ministers went through fire and water to rescue the power. This article tries to compare the difference between two the dynasties from the loyalty to the emperor.
出处 《渤海大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2005年第3期20-24,共5页 Journal of Bohai University:Philosophy & Social Science Edition
关键词 忠君观念 王莽 外戚宦官 conception of loyalty Wang Mang eunuch and Waiqi
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[3]司马迁.史记,卷8,高祖本纪[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
  • 2[6]司马迁.史记卷99,叔孙通列传[M].北京:中华书局,1965.
  • 3[8]贾谊.新书·服疑[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1976.
  • 4[9]赵翼.陔余丛考,卷36,至尊[M].北京:商务印书馆,1957.
  • 5[10]董仲舒.春秋繁露,卷10,深察名号[M].北京:中华书局,1991.
  • 6[11]董仲舒.春秋繁露,卷10,五行对[M].北京:中华书局,1991.
  • 7[12]董仲舒.春秋繁露,卷12,基义[M].北京:中华书局,1991.
  • 8[16]司马迁.史记,卷53,萧相国世家[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
  • 9[17]司马迁.史记,卷57,绛周勃世家[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
  • 10[26]司马光.资治通鉴,卷47,汉和帝永元二年[M].北京:中华书局,1956.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部