期刊文献+

莫西沙星治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的临床疗效及体外抗菌活性的研究 被引量:14

Study on efficacy of moxifloxacin in the treatment of AECB and its antimicrobial activity in vitro
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价莫西沙星口服胶囊治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重(AECB)的临床疗效及体外抗菌活性。方法采用随机、开放、平行对照试验设计。选择AECB病例100例,其中可评价病例86例,莫西沙星治疗组(试验组)42例,给莫西沙星400 mg qd,疗程5-10 d;左氧氟沙星治疗组(对照组)44例,给左氧氟沙星200 mg,hid,疗程7-14 d。结果莫西沙星治疗组与左氧氟沙星治疗组临床有效率分别为92.86%(39/42)和88.64%(39/44);痊愈率分别为78.57%(33/42)和68.18%(30/44)。两组有效率、痊愈率经统计学处理,无显著差异(P>0.05);细菌清除率分别为96.88%(31/32)和82.14%(23/28),细菌阴转率分别为96.88%(31/32)和82.14%(23/28),两组细菌清除率、阴转率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论莫西沙星治疗AECB临床疗效可靠。 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy in treating AECB with oral moxifloxacin and the antimicrobiol activity in vitro. METHODS: The trial design was random, open, and parallel control. 100 patients with AECB were involved. 86 Cases evaluated were randomly divided into the test group or the control group. 42 Patients in test group were given 400 mg moxifloxacin capsule for 5-10 d, while 44 patients in control group were given 200 mg levofloxacin capsule twice a day for 7-14 d. RESULTS: The effective rates of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin were 92.86% (39/42) and 88.64% (39/44); the recovery rates were 78.57% (33/42) and 68.18% (30/44, respectively. The bacterial eradication rates were 96.88% (31/32) and 82.14% (23/28) in two groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Moxifloxacin has good effect against AECB.
出处 《中国药学杂志》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第9期702-704,共3页 Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南(草案)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,1999,22(4):199-201. 被引量:1036
  • 2Aamerican Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the management of adults with community acquired pneumonia[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2001,163:1730.
  • 3European Respiratory Society. Guidelines for management of adult community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections[J]. Eur Respir J,1998,11(4):986.
  • 4Blondeau JM, Laskowski R, Bjarnason J, et al. Comparative in vitro activity of gatifloxacin, grepagloxacin, Ievofloxacin, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin against 4151 Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms [J]. Int I Antimicrob Agents ,2000,14:450.
  • 5Urueta J, Ariza J, de Brito A, et al. Safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin vs levofloxacin in the treatment of AECB[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect ,2001,7(Suppl) 1:168.
  • 6Barman BJA, Wiseman LR. Moxifloxacin[J]. J Drugs,1999,57(3):363.
  • 7Hautamaki D, Bruya T, Kureishi A, et al. Short course(5-days)moxifloxacin versus 7-days levofloxacin therapy for treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis[J]. Todays Ther Trends, 2001,19:117.
  • 8Chodosh S, de Abate CA, Haverstock D, et al.Short-course moxifloxacin therapy for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis[J]. Respir Med ,2000,94(1):17.
  • 9Piddock LJ, Johnson M, Ricci V, et al. Activities of new fluoroquinolones against fluoroquinolone-resistant pathogens of the lower respiratory tract[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1998,42(11):2956.
  • 10Baz MN, Jannetti W, Villanueva C, et al. The efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin compared with trovafloxacin in the treatment of acute sinusitis[J].Today Ther Trends, 1999,17(4):303.

共引文献1035

同被引文献141

引证文献14

二级引证文献169

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部