期刊文献+

稗草和水分胁迫对大豆植株根瘤固氮速率的交互影响 被引量:1

Interaction of Barnyardgrass and Water Stress on Nitrogen Fixation of Soybean
下载PDF
导出
摘要 稗草和水分胁迫对大豆植株根瘤固氮速率有显著的交互影响。在旱、涝结合及座英期淹水条件下,稗草对大豆根瘤固氮的危害,明显比在正常供水条件下重,而在幼苗期~开花期渍涝条件下明显比在正常水分供应条件下轻,甚至化害为益。任何时期、任何种类的水分胁迫处理皆不利于大豆根瘤固氮,且旱害大于涝害,先涝后旱的危害大于先旱后涝的危害,旱、涝结合的危害大于单旱或单涝的危害,开花期渍涝的危害最重,鼓粒期渍涝的危害最轻;开花期至座英期,大豆根瘤固氮对旱涝结合+稗草干扰的交互危害最为敏感。 Barnyardgrass interference and water stress had a significant interaction on the nitrogen fixation of soybean. Barnyardgrass could reduce the nitrogen fixation of soybean to a greater extent under water stress by drought+waterlogging during all soybean growth stages or singel waterlogging during soybean pod setting stage, but to a less extent or stimulated it under waterlogging treatment during soybean seedling or flowing stages, compared to that under the normal soil moisture condition. Both drought and waterlogging decreased the mean soybean nitrogen fixation rate. Among them, the drought injury was greater than that of waterlogging injury, the injury of the water stress treatment ' First waterlogging and then drought' was greater than that of the opposite treatment ' First drought and then waterlogging ' , the injury of the stress combination ' Waterlogging+drought' was greater than that of a single drought or waterlogging. Moreover, waterlogging showed its greatest inhibition during soybean flowing stage and a least one during soybean pod filling stage. During the flowing and pod filling stage soybean nitrogen fixation was most sensitive to the interaction injure of the water stress by drought+waterlogging and barnyardgrass interference.
作者 由振国
机构地区 北京农业大学
出处 《中国农学通报》 CSCD 1994年第2期4-7,共4页 Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
关键词 稗草 水分胁迫 大豆 固氮 根瘤 Barnyardgrass Water stress Soybeans nitrogen fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献3

  • 1由振国,杂草学报,1990年,1期,12页
  • 2由振国,1990年
  • 3由振国,1989年

共引文献2

同被引文献14

  • 1曾昭海,隋新华,胡跃高,陈丹明,陈文新,郜瑞路.紫花苜蓿-根瘤菌高效共生体筛选及田间作用效果[J].草业学报,2004,13(5):95-100. 被引量:41
  • 2万晓红,韦革宏,杨亚珍,朱毓华.紫花苜蓿品种根瘤菌表型多样性研究[J].草地学报,2004,12(4):276-280. 被引量:15
  • 3Serraj R,Sinclair T R,Purcell L C.Symbiotic N2 fixation response to drought[J].Experibot,1999,50:143-155
  • 4Olsen P E,Rice W A.Stemke G W,Page W J.Strainspecific serological techniques for the identification of Rhizobium meliloti in commercial alfalfa inoculants[J].Can.J.Microbiol,1983,29:225-230
  • 5Aparicio-Tejo et al.Efficiencies and inefficiencies in the legume-rhizobium symbiosis-a review[J].Plant and Soil,1984,82:273-284
  • 6Rice W A,Olsen P E.Root-temperature effects on competition for nodule occupancy between two Rhizobium neliloti strains[J].Bio.Fertil.Soils,1988,6:137-140
  • 7Smith C W,Soybean.crop production evaluation,history and technology[M].Wilcy,New York,1995.1:351-357
  • 8Trotman A P,Weaver R W.Tolerance of clover rhizobia to heat and desiccation stresses in soil[J].Soil Sci.Soc Am,1995,59(2):466-4701
  • 9Aparicio-Tejo et al.Efficiencies and inefficiencies in the legume-rhizobium symbiosis-a review[C].Plant and Soil.1984,82:273-284
  • 10刘永秀,张福锁,毛达如.根际微生态系统中豆科植物-根瘤菌共生固氮及其在可持续农业发展中的作用[J].中国农业科技导报,1999,1(4):28-33. 被引量:15

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部