期刊文献+

当代西方科学与宗教关系反冲突论批判

Criticism on the Theory of Anti-conflict about Contemporary Western Science and Religion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在科学与宗教的关系问题上,“冲突论”一直占据着主导地位。目前,这种观点遭到了以巴伯、布鲁克和康托尔等为代表的西方学者的广泛质疑与批判,反冲突论思潮盛行一时。不过,当代反冲突论在批判过程中又走到了另一个极端。即使在今天,“冲突论”在一定的意义上仍然是可以成立的。 The conflict theory plays a leading role in the relation between science and religion. However, the theory is extensively doubted and criticized by some western scholars, such as Ian G Barbour, John Brooke, and the anti-conflict theory has become very popular. But the contemporary anti-conflict theory has gone to another extreme. In fact, the conflict theory is reasonable in some sense even today.
作者 刘魁 朱晓飞
出处 《淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2005年第3期307-311,419,共6页 Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 教育部教育科学"十五"规划项目(DEA030106)。
关键词 科学与宗教 反冲突论 四模式论 巴伯 science and religion the Anti-conflict Theory Theory of Four Models Ian G Barbour
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]J W Draper.History of Conflict between Science and Religion[M].New York: D Appleton.1874.
  • 2[2]A D White.A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology,2 vols[M].New York:D Appleton.1896.
  • 3[3]Barbour,Ian G. Religion and Science: Historical and Contemporary Issues[M].San Francisco:Harper San Francisco,1997.77.
  • 4[4]Brooke,John,Cantor,Geoffrey.Reconstructing Nature: The Engagement of Science and Religion[m]. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.1998.6-9.
  • 5[5]Cantor,Geoffrey and Kenny,Chris.Barbour's Fourfold Way:Problems With His Taxonomy of Science-Religion Relationship[M].Zygon, vol.36,No.4:765-781.2001.770.
  • 6[6][美]詹姆斯·E·麦克莱伦第三,等.世界史上的科学技术[M].王鸣阳译.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2003.266.
  • 7[7]爱德华·伯曼.宗教裁判所[M].何开松译.辽宁:辽宁教育出版社,2001.173-178.
  • 8罗素.宗教与科学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982.123.

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部