期刊文献+

中美大学生应激相关问题的跨文化比较 被引量:7

The Cross-Culture Comparison of Stresses of Chinese and American Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨大学生应激相关问题,研究应激的跨文化特点。方法:采取随机抽样、量表建构法和探索性因素分析等多元统计方法对17-27岁的2、3年级中美大学生应激进行了跨文化研究。结果:中美大学生的应激源均包括生存焦虑、社交恐惧和角色紧张三个因素;缓冲因素由社会支持和自我效能感两个因素组成。美国大学生的角色紧张高于中国大学生,而中国大学生在生存焦虑和社交恐惧因素上的得分高于美国大学生。结论:美国大学生在应对应激方面,比中国大学生更具有自信。中美大学生有相似的应激源及应激缓冲因素。 Objective:To study the difference of stresses on Chinese and American college students. Methods:The cross-culture research was processed by the multi-statistics analysis which including the random sampling,scale constructing and exploratory factor analysis.Results:the stressors of Chinese and American students included three factors:Survival Anxiety,Social Anxiety,and Role Stress.Resilience Factors consist of two factors: Social Support and Self-Efficiency.The role stress of American students was higher than that of Chinese students. The survival anxiety and social anxiety of Chinese students were higher than those of American students. Conclusion:American students had higher self-confidence on the copying stresses.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第5期327-329,共3页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1何蔚.大学生心理卫生状况的调查与分析[J].心理学探新,1992(4):34-37. 被引量:83
  • 2陈绍健.大学生心理卫生状况及其原因分析[J].应用心理学,1988(4):46-54. 被引量:27
  • 3Driscoll MP, Beehr TA. Moderating Effects of Perceived Control and Need for Clarity on the relationship Between Role Stressors and Employee Affective Reactions. J Soc Psychol, 2000,149(2):151-159.
  • 4Siegall M. Putting the stress back into stress: Improving the measurement of role conflict and role ambiguity. J Managerial Psychol, 2000,15(2):427-429.
  • 5Gillepie NA, Walsh M, Winefield AH. Occupational Stress in Iniversities: Staff Perceptions of the Causes, Consequence and Moderators of Stress. Work & Stress, 2001, 15:53-72.
  • 6孙鹤订.大学生因精神疾病所致辍学情况分析[J].社会心理研究,1996,7(4):52-55.

共引文献108

同被引文献111

引证文献7

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部