期刊文献+

关于行政评价法制度的研究 被引量:1

Research on Administrative Evaluation System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立行政评价法制度是当代西方国家行政法发展的新趋势。行政评价法的概念在各国政府绩效管理的实践中逐步明确化。行政评价法制度以公共利益为价值取向,根据公众满意程度评价行政绩效,具有公共性的基本内涵;程序性是行政评价法的根本属性。在我国导入行政评价法,对于实现政府行政决策科学化,使财政得到充分有效利用,提高行政效率以及遏制腐败等方面具有重大现实意义。行政评价法制度应以效率、成果概念为核心,注重效率与质量、效率与程序的平衡;行政公开是行政评价的本质要求和显著特征,行政评价能够推动公开的深化,促使政府主动公开信息;行政服务向民营化转变是行政评价法制度的目标之一;行政评价法制度的宗旨是实现人民群众广泛参与。 Establishing administrative evaluation system is the new tendency of the administrative law development in modern western countries. The concept of the administrative evaluation system has been clarified in the governments' performance evaluation practice. Administrative evaluation system is based on public interests,and the evaluation of government's performance is based on public citizens' satisfactory degree. Thus it has the basic meaning of publicity.It also has procedural attribute.To set up administrative evaluation system in China,it is of great significances realizing scientific government policies,making full use of finance,enhancing administrative efficiency and ceasing corruption.Administrative evaluation system should lay emphases on efficiency and results,and try to make balance between efficiency and quality,efficiency and procedure at the same time; Administrative openness is the essencial demand and notable character of administrative evaluation,and administrative evaluation system can push forward the administrative openness to depth;Administration service changing to privacy is one of the goals of administrative evaluation;And the final purpose for administrative evaluation is to realize the citizen's widespread participation.
作者 周实 关静
机构地区 东北大学
出处 《行政与法》 2005年第5期43-45,共3页 Administration and Law
关键词 行政评价法制度 公共性 行政效率 行政公开 Administrative evaluation system Publicity Administrative efficiency Administrative openness
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献27

  • 1左然.当代国际公共行政的发展与改革(下)[J].中国行政管理,1997(10):40-43. 被引量:8
  • 2周志忍.公共组织绩效评估──英国的实践及其对我们的启示[J].新视野,1995(5):38-41. 被引量:111
  • 3Rachel Silcock. What Is E-government? [J]. Journal of Comparative Politics. 2001, (1): 88- 101.
  • 4National Performance Review (NPR), Washington 1993 (www. npr. gov/library/reports/it, html).
  • 5H. G. Frederickosn. Social equity and public administration: A Symposium [J ] Public Administration Review. 1974, (3): 51.
  • 6Jack Rabin, W. Bartley Hildreth and Gerald J. Miller. Handbook of Public Administration [M]. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1989. 21, 21.
  • 7H. G. Frederickson. Classics of Public Administration [M]. Hartcourt Brace College Publishers. Fort Worth: Texas, 1997. 58.
  • 8Donald F. Kettl and H. Brinton Milward. The State of Public Management [M]. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. 3.
  • 9Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler. Reinventing Government:How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector From the Schoolhouse to Statehouse [M]. Mass. : Addison-Wesley. 1992. 5.
  • 10Hood Christopher. A Public Management for all Seasons? [J]. Public Administration. 1991, (1): 92 -101.

共引文献420

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部