摘要
道德的多样性、差异性使道德批评陷入了主观主义,道德的功利性使道德批评与文学对象难以契合,道德形而上不能确证文学批评的合法性。文学价值不等同于道德价值。对文学内容的道德性改写是不合理的,用道德形而上/形而下既不能说明一部作品、一个形象成功或失败的原因,也说明不了它们的美学价值。文学史不是道德史。"红色道德形而上"也弥合不了"政治伦理化"与"审美价值"之间的裂隙。
The variety and difference of morality make the moral criticism become subjectivism. The moral utilitarian makes the moral criticism disagree with literature. The moral metaphysics can't prove the legitimacy of literary criticism. The literature value is not equal to the moral value. Rewriting the literature contents morally is illegal. The moral metaphysics neither explains the reason the success or failure of any of the works nor any image, nor its aesthetic value. The literary history is not the moral history. The 'red moral metaphysics' also can't fill up the gap between the ethical politics and the aesthetic value.
关键词
道德
文学
道德形而上
审美价值
morality
literature
the moral metaphysics
aesthetic value
