期刊文献+

住院与社区麻风治愈者的生活质量及个性特征调查 被引量:9

Investigation on Personality and Quality of Life in Cured Patients with Leprosy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨住院与社区麻风治愈者的生活质量及个性特征。方法:采用生活质量问卷、艾森克个性问卷,对广东韶关市麻风医院51例麻风治愈者及韶关市下属两个县的104例社区麻风治愈者与59例健康亲属进行调查。结果:住院组的生活质量总评(51.83±9.64)与社区组(63.40±10.84)及其亲属组(66.25±11.16)比较有显著性差异(F=28.45;P<0.01);其中,躯体功能维度、心理功能维度、社会功能维度三组比较均有显著性差异(P<0.01)。住院组的EPQ-E分和EPQ-N分(7.71±4.43;8.94±4.68)与社区组(9.58±4.29;6.18±4.88)及其健康亲属组(11.46±3.98;6.32±5.16)比较有显著性差异(F=10.75~5.91;P<0.01)。麻风治愈者的各个生活质量维度与EPQ-E呈显著正相关(r=0.21~0.44,P<0.01);与EPQ-N呈显著负相关(r=-0.24-0.65,P<0.01)。结论:住院麻风治愈者的生活质量比社区麻风治愈者及其亲属的生活质量差,个性特征与生活质量密切相关。 Objective: To explore personality and quality of life in cured patients with leprosy. Methods: 51 cured leprosy inpatients and 104 cured patients or 59 normal controls in community were investigated by quality of life questionnaire and EPQ. Results: The general scores (51.83±9.64)of life quality in cured leprosy inpatients were lower than that in community patients(63.40±10.84) and normal controls(66.25±11.16), with significant difference(F =28.45; P <0.01). Among three groups, there were significant difference in scores of body's function, psychological and social function(P <0.01). The scores of EPQ-E in inpatients(7.71±4.43) were lower than that in community patients(9.58±4.29) and normal controls(11.46±3.98), and the scores of EPQ-N in inpatients(8.94±4.68) were higher than that in community patients(6.18±4.88) and normal controls(6.32±5.16), with significant difference(F =10.75~5.91, P <0.01).Quality of life in cured patients with leprosy have significant positive correlation with EPQ-E(r =0.21~0.44, P <0.01),and have significant negative correlation with EPQ-N(r =-0.24-0.65, P <0.01). Conclusion: Life quality in cured patients with leprosy were worse than that in community patients and normal controls, personality was high correlation with life quality.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 2005年第2期229-231,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1岳文浩,付文青,芦宗玉,江虹,田明晓,王方.怒伤肝机制研究[J].医学与哲学,1995,16(9):481-483. 被引量:24
  • 2李凌江,张亚林,杨德森,郝伟,肖水源,李振国,廖巨福,吴舸,罗友根,黄俊,张斌,刘解宁.社区人群生活质量研究──Ⅱ方法学及社区人群的总体生活质量[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1995,9(4):186-190. 被引量:220
  • 3汪向东 等.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].中国心理卫生杂志社,1999,12..
  • 4殷大奎.中国控制麻风的成就与展望[J].中国麻风杂志,1998,14:209-209.
  • 5江澄.麻风防治是跨世纪的事业[J].中国麻风杂志,1996,12:41-41.
  • 6-.新中国预防医学历史经验(第3卷,第一版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1988.224.
  • 7Brady MJ,Cella DF,Mo F,et al.Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast(FACT-B) quality of life instrument.Journal of Clinical Oncology(in review)
  • 8Gotay CC, Korn EI, McCabe MS,et al.Building quality of life assmssment into cancer treatment studies.Oncology 1992,6:25-28
  • 9Moinpour CM,Feigl P,Metch Be,et al.Quality of life end points in cancer clinical trials:review and recommendations.J Natl Cancer Inst,1989,81:485-495
  • 10Machin D.Assessing quality of life in comparative cancer clinical trial:does it make a difference?Controlled Clin Trial,1997,18:301-305

共引文献524

同被引文献75

引证文献9

二级引证文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部