期刊文献+

烟气条件对直流电晕自由基簇射NO氧化过程的影响 被引量:2

Effect of Flue Gas Conditions on NO Oxidation Process by DC Corona Radical Shower
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用以湿空气为自由基源物质的直流电晕自由基簇射系统,研究了烟气在反应器内的滞留时间、烟气流速和NO浓度对NO氧化过程的影响.结果表明:烟气流速的增加会抑制电晕放电的发展,而烟气中NO浓度的增加则使放电变得更加容易.NO的氧化受烟气在反应器内滞留时间的影响较小,而它受烟气流速的影响较大.在2W的输入功率下,当烟气在反应器内的滞留时间从8 5s增加到34 .2s时,NO的氧化率只从5 4 . 5 %提高到5 7 .6 %.而在1 7W·h/m3 的能量密度下,当烟气流速从1 . 4cm/s增加到6 .3cm/s时,NO的氧化率从6 0 0 %减少到38 .6 %,能量利用率也从2 0 . 8g/ (kW·h)下降到了1 3 .3g/ (kW·h) .在湿空气流量一定的情况下,NO初始浓度存在一个最佳值,本实验中最佳的NO浓度为1 0 0×1 0 -6左右. Using an air-H_2O DC corona radical shower system, the influences of reside time of flue gas in the reactor, velocity of flue gas and NO concentration on NO oxidation process were studied. The results show that the increasing velocity of flue gas can restrain corona development and the increasing NO concentration can make discharge more easy. The reside time of flue gas in the reactor has less effect on the NO oxidation. The NO oxidation rate increased only from 54.5% to 57.6% at 2W input power when the reside time of flue gas in the reactor increased from 8.5s to 34.2s. However, the velocity of flue gas has important effect on the NO oxidation. At 1.7W·h/m3 energy density, when the velocity of flue gas increased from 1.4cm/s to 6.3cm/s, the NO oxidation rate droped from 60.0% to 38.6% and the energy yield also falled from 20.8g/(kW·h) to 13.3g/(kW·h). Under the certain flux of humid air, NO initial concentration has a best value, which was about 100×10 -6 in this experiment.
出处 《环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第3期7-11,共5页 Environmental Science
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划 (863 )项目 (2 0 0 2AA5 2 9180 ) 教育部博士点基金资助项目 (2 0 0 2 0 3 3 5 0 61) 国家自然科学基金资助项目 (5 0 1760 45 )
关键词 电晕 自由基 NO 氧化 影响 烟气 corona radical NO oxidation effect flue gas
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1周勇平,高翔,吴祖良,骆仲泱,魏恩宗,倪明江,岑可法.直流电晕自由基簇射治理甲苯的试验研究[J].环境科学,2003,24(4):136-139. 被引量:41
  • 2Chang J S. Recently development of plasma pollution control technology: a critical review [J ]. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2001, 2(3-4): 571-576.
  • 3Chang J S. Next generation integrated electrostatic gas cleaning systems[J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 2003, 57 : 273 - 291.
  • 4Yan K P, Yamamoto T, Kanazawa S, et al. NO removal characteristics of a corona radical shower system under DC and AC/DC superimposed operation [ J].IEEE Transaction on Industry Applications, 2001, 37(5) : 1449-1504.
  • 5Ohkubo T, Kanazawa S, et al. NOx Removal by a Pipe with Nozzle-plate Electrode Corona Discharge System [J]. IEEETrans. Ind. Appl. , 1994, 30(4): 856-861.
  • 6Ohkubo T, Kanazawa S, et al. Time dependence of NOx removal rate by a corona radical shower system [J]. IEEETrans. Ind. Appl., 1996, 32(5): 1058-1062.
  • 7林赫,高翔,骆仲泱,倪明江,岑可法.烟气湿度对自由基簇射脱除烟气中的NO_X的影响[J].动力工程,2003,23(3):2444-2449. 被引量:4
  • 8Lin H, Gao X, Luo Z Y, Cen K F, et al. Removal of NOx from wet flue gas by corona dlscharge[J]. Fuel, 2004, 83(9):1251 - 1255.
  • 9Kim H H, Prieo G, et al. Performance evaluation of discharge plasma process for gaseous pollutant removal [ J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 2002, 55:25-41.
  • 10Gallimberti I. Impulse corona simulation for flue gas treatment [Jl. Pure and Appl. Chem., 1988, 60(5): 663-674.

二级参考文献24

  • 1袁贤鑫等.催化燃烧法治理有机废气[J].化工环保,1984,4(4):219-225.
  • 2Chang JS. Energetic Electron Induced Plasma Process for Reduction of Acid and Greenhouse Gases in Combustion Flue Gas[J]. In No-Thermal Plasma Technolgies for Pollution Control: Part A, Springer, Berlin, 1993.
  • 3Kawamara K, Hirasawa A, et ah Pilot Plant Experiment of NOx and SO2 Removal from Exhaust Gases by Eleetron Beam Irradiation[J]. Radiate Phys. Chem., 1979,13(1):5-12.
  • 4Tokunaga O, Suzuki N. Radiation Chemical Reactions in NOx and SO2 Removals from Flue Gas[J]. Radiate Phys.Chem. , 1980,24(1):145-165.
  • 5Masuda S, et al. Control of NOx by Positive and Negative Pulsed Corona Discharges [J]. IEEE Trans, On Indus.App. , 1990,26(2):374-383.
  • 6Giorgio Dinelli, et al. Industrial Experiments on Pulse Corona Simultaneous Removal of NOx and SO2 from Flue Gas [J]. IEEE Trans. On Indus. App. 1990,26(3):535-541.
  • 7Koichi Takaki, et al. Removal of Nitric Oxide in Flue Gases by Multipoint to Plane Dielectric Barrier Discharge [J].IEEE TRnas. on Plasma Sc. , 1999,27(4) : 1121-1135.
  • 8Toshikazu Ohkaho, et al. NOx Remova by a Pipe with Nozzle-Plate Electrode Corona Discharge System [J]. IEEE trans, on Indus. App., 1994,30(4):856-860.
  • 9Park JJY, Chang JS. Simultaneous Removal of NOx and SO2 from NO-SO2-CO2-N2-O2 Gas Mixtures by Corona Radical Shower Systems[J]. IEEE trans, on Indus. App. , 1994,30(4) :856-860.
  • 10Li Rui-nian, Liu Xin. Main Fundamental Gas Reaction in Renitrification and Desulfurization from Flue Gas by Nonthermal Plasmas [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000,55:2491-2506.

共引文献42

同被引文献14

  • 1吴祖良,高翔,魏恩宗,张继洲,李明波,吴祖成,骆仲泱,倪明江,岑可法.自由基源物质变化对直流电晕自由基簇射脱除NO的影响[J].化工学报,2005,56(5):915-919. 被引量:7
  • 2李天鸣,闫光绪,郭绍辉.低温等离子体放电技术应用研究进展[J].石化技术,2007,14(2):59-63. 被引量:8
  • 3YIN Shui-e, SUN Bao-min, GAO Xu-dong, et al. The effect of oxygen and water vapor on nitric oxide conver- sion with a dielectric barrier discharge reactor [ J ]. Plasma Chem Plasma Process,2009,29:421 -431.
  • 4YANK P, YAMAMOTO T, KANAZAWA S, et al. Control of flow stabilized positive corona dischargemodes and NO removal characteristics in dry air by CO2 injections[ J ] . Journal of Electrostatics, 1999,46 (2) :207 -219.
  • 5CHANG J S. Recently development of plasma pollution control technology:a critical review [J]. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2001, 2(3/4) : 571 - 576.
  • 6CHANG J S. Next generation integrated electrostatic gas cleaning systems [J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 2003, 57(3): 273-291.
  • 7OHKUBO T, KANAZAWA S, NOMOTO Y, et al. NOx removal by a pipe with nozzle-plate electrode corona discharge system [J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 1994, 30(4) : 856 - 861.
  • 8OHKUBO T, KANAZAWA S, NOMOTO Y, et al. Time dependence of NOx removal rate by a corona radical shower system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 1996, 32(5) : 1058 - 1062.
  • 9YAN K P, YAMAMOTO T, KANAZAWA S, et al. Control of flow stabilized positive corona discharge modes and NO removal characteristics in dry air by CO2 injections [J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 1999, 46 (2) : 207 - 219.
  • 10GALLIMBERTI I. Impulse corona simulation for flue gas treatment [J]. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1988, 60(5) : 663 - 674.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部