期刊文献+

德国历史学派与19世纪经济学方法论之争的启示 被引量:16

Implications of the German Historical School of Economics and the Methodenstreit in the Mid-19th Century
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In the mid-19th century, out of their dissatisfaction with the neglect of the economic theories about other countries’ experiences in the British classic economics, the economists in the German Historical School worked hard to construct an economic theory that was congruent to the developmental stage in their own country’s culture and history. Their deeply-cherished concern about the reality in a transitional era when Germany was approaching modernization drove them to propose that the living condition of the working class be improved by the power of the state. In the late 80’s of the same century, the Methodenstreit of German Historical School versus the Austrian School broke out, after which the mainstream economics was well on its way in terms of theoretical refinement and scrutiny, whereas the influence from the Historical School gradually subsided. Even so, the lessons from the Historical School are still enlightening to research in contemporary social sciences. This paper describes the unique basics in the theory building of the Historical School; explains the background and meaning of its academic origin, research methodology, and the Methodenstreit; and from there, discusses implications for contemporary social sciences. In the mid-19th century, out of their dissatisfaction with the neglect of the economic theories about other countries' experiences in the British classic economics, the economists in the German Historical School worked hard to construct an economic theory that was congruent to the developmental stage in their own country's culture and history. Their deeply-cherished concern about the reality in a transitional era when Germany was approaching modernization drove them to propose that the living condition of the working class be improved by the power of the state. In the late 80's of the same century, the Methodenstreit of German Historical School versus the Austrian School broke out, after which the mainstream economics was well on its way in terms of theoretical refinement and scrutiny, whereas the influence from the Historical School gradually subsided. Even so, the lessons from the Historical School are still enlightening to research in contemporary social sciences. This paper describes the unique basics in the theory building of the Historical School; explains the background and meaning of its academic origin, research methodology, and the Methodenstreit; and from there, discusses implications for contemporary social sciences.
作者 何蓉
出处 《社会》 北大核心 2005年第3期167-186,共20页 Chinese Journal of Sociology
关键词 经济学方法论 19世纪 历史学派 School ACADEMIC culture science about 德国 from origin that other and power after which STILL there with hard when LATE well This its of to way are for In be on so the Historical School, the Methodenstreit, Gustav Schmoller, theory and history, induction and deduction
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1阿伦·布洛克 董乐山译.《西方人文主义传统》[M].生活·读 书·新知三联书店,1997..
  • 2张广智 等.《西方史学史》[M].复旦大学出版社,2000年版.第303页.
  • 3约瑟夫·熊彼特.《资本主义、社会主义与民主》[M].商务出版社,2000年.第209-211页.
  • 4约翰·内维丁·凯恩斯.《政治经济学的范围与方法》[M].北京:华夏出版社,2001..
  • 5圭多·德·拉吉罗.《欧洲自由主义史》[M].吉林人民出版社,2001..
  • 6路德维希·冯·米德斯.《经济学的认识论问题》[M].经济科学出版社,2001..
  • 7梅尔茨.《十九世纪欧洲思想史》(第一卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999..
  • 8亨利·威廉·斯皮格尔.《经济思想的成长》(上)[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999..
  • 9阿兰·图海纳.《我们能否共同生存—既彼此平等又互有差异》[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003..
  • 10约瑟夫·熊彼特.《经济分析史》第三卷[M].商务印书馆,1994..

同被引文献261

引证文献16

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部