期刊文献+

颈椎椎间融合器融合效果的在体动物研究 被引量:4

In vivo experimental study of cervical intervertebral fusion cage
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的在活体山羊颈椎上比较三面皮质自体骨、垂直圆柱体Harmscage及方盒形Carboncage的椎间融合效果。方法取24只成年雄性山羊,随机分为三组:自体骨组、Harmscage组及Car-boncage组。所有动物均行C3-4椎间盘切除术并分别植入以上内植物。于术前、术后即刻及术后1、2、4、8、12周摄颈椎正侧位X线片,于侧位X线片上测量平均椎间高度、椎间角及前凸角;术后12周处死动物,取C3,4节段标本进行组织学评估。结果术后1周Carboncage组的平均椎间高度、椎间角及前凸角大于Harmscage组和自体骨组(P<0.05);术后12周两个cage组的平均椎间高度、椎间角及前凸角均大于自体骨组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后12周依据融合分级标准对三组进行影像学评估,和自体骨组比较,两个cage组的骨融合效果略好,但无统计学意义;组织形态学亦发现两个cage组的椎间融合效果较好,但与自体骨组比较差异无统计学意义。垂直圆柱体Harmscage中形成的新生骨量多于方盒形Carboncage。结论方盒形Carboncage具有良好的椎间支撑能力,而垂直圆柱体Harmscage的椎间融合效果更好。 Objective To evaluate the characteristics of intervertebral fusion using autologous tricortical iliac crest graft, Harms cage and Carbon cage in the goat cervical spine models. Methods Twenty-four goats underwent C3-4 discectomy and intervertebral fusion, the later was achieved each with 8 goats by the following methods: Group 1, autologous tricortical iliac crest bone graft; Group 2, Harms cage filled with autologous iliac crest graft; Group 3, Carbon cage filled with autologous iliac bone graft. Radiography was performed pre- and post- operatively and after 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At the same time points, disc space height (DSH), intervertebral angle (IVA), and lordosis angle (LA) were measured. After 12 weeks, the goats were killed and fused segments were harvested. All cervical fusion specimens underwent histomorphological studies. Results One week after operation, the DSH, IVA and LA of Carbon cage fused group were statistically greater than those of autologous iliac bone graft and Harms cage fused group (P<0.05). The values for DSH, IVA and LA were significantly higher in cage-treated goats than that in bone graft over a 12-week period (P<0.05). Both of radiographic and histomorphologic evaluation revealed better fusion in two cage groups than in autologous bone group, but there was no any statistical significance. Conclusion Box shaped Carbon cage can provide a good intervertebral support, and vertical cylindrical Harms cage can get better intervertebral fusion.
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第5期301-305,共5页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Weiner BK, Fraser RD. Spine update lumbar interbody cages. Spine,1998, 23: 634-640.
  • 2Kandziora F, Schollmeier G, Scholz M, et al. Influence of cage design on interbody fusion in a sheep cervical spine model. J Neurosurg Spine, 2002, 96: 321-332.
  • 3Goh JC, Wong HK, Thambyah A, et al. Influence of PLIF cage size on lumbar spine stability. Spine, 2000, 25: 35-40.
  • 4Kettler A, Wilke HJ, Dietl R, et al. Stabilizing effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages before and after cyclic loading. J Neurosurg Spine, 2000, 92: 87-92.
  • 5Wilke H J, Kettler A, Claes LE. Are sheep spines a valid biomechanical model for human spines? Spine, 1997, 22: 2365-2374.
  • 6Dennis S, Watkins R, Landaker S, et al. Comparison of disc space heights after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine, 1989, 14: 876-878.
  • 7Sandhu HS, Turner S, Kabo JM, et al. Distractive properties of a threaded interbody fusion device: an in vivo model. Spine, 1996, 21:1201-1210.
  • 8Wilke HJ, Kettler A, Goetz C, et al. Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements: an in vitro investigation with a new cervical fusion cage. Spine, 2000, 25: 2762-2770.
  • 9Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Ghanayem AJ, et al. Load-carrying capacity of the human cervical spine in compression is increased under a follower load. Spine, 2000, 25: 1548-1554.
  • 10Kanayama M, Cunningham BW, Haggerty CJ, et al. In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices. J Neurosurg Spine, 2000, 93:259-265.

同被引文献33

  • 1李鉴轶,朱青安,原林,赵卫东,林荔军,黄文华,吴旸.颈椎终板结构的生物力学研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(2):108-112. 被引量:24
  • 2王达义,温国宏,曹文华,海涌.胸腰椎结核手术治疗中前后路内固定的选择[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2004,14(12):752-753. 被引量:11
  • 3马远征,胡明,才晓军,陈兴,李宏伟,隰建成,薛海滨.脊柱结核外科治疗的探讨[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(2):68-73. 被引量:178
  • 4瞿东滨,金大地,陈建庭,江建明,王吉兴,鲁凯伍,张忠民.脊柱结核外科治疗的术式选择[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(2):74-78. 被引量:107
  • 5刘鹏,赵建华,李起鸿.病灶清除植骨融合联合内固定治疗脊柱结核[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(7):417-420. 被引量:39
  • 6Guven O,Kumano K,Yalcin S,et al.A single stage posterior approach and rigid fixation for preventing kyphosis in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis.Spine,1994,19:1039-1043.
  • 7Das K,Couldwell WT,Sava G,et al.Use of cylindrical titanium mesh and locking plates in anterior cervical fusion:technical note.J Neurosurg,2001,94(1 Suppl):174-178.
  • 8Goh JC,Wong HK,Thambyah A,et al.Influence of PLIF cage size on lumbar spine stability.Spine,2000,25:35-40.
  • 9Kettler A,Wilke HJ,Dietl R,et al.Stabilizing effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages before and after cyclic loading.J Neurosurg,2000,92(1 Suppl):87-92.
  • 10Kanayama M,Cunningham BW,Haggerty C J,et al.In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices.J Neurosurg,2000,93 (2 Suppl):259-265.

引证文献4

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部