期刊文献+

脑卒中患者主客观记忆能力对工具性日常生活活动能力的预测价值 被引量:2

The prediction of IADL by subjective and objective memory ability for stroke patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过对脑卒中患者工具性日常生活活动能力与其主客观记忆能力之间关系的研究,判别影响IA DL的记忆功能因素,探讨脑卒中患者主客观记忆能力对IADL的预测价值。方法:对52例脑卒中患者用RBMT测试其客观记忆能力;采用视觉模拟评价法评测患者的主观记忆能力;用FAQ评估其IADL能力。然后用Pearson相关分析来观察IADL与主客观记忆能力的关系;再以FAQ为因变量,行多元逐步回归分析和Logistic多元逐步回归分析以探讨脑卒中患者主客观记忆能力对IAD L的预测价值。结果:①患者的主观记忆能力与RBMT呈显著正相关(P<0.05);FAQ与主观及RBMT呈显著负相关(P<0.05,P<0.01)。②多元逐步回归分析显示:RBMT中记被藏物、信封两个分项目以及RBMT总分进入方程(P<0.05),且RBMT总分是IA DL的显著预测因子(R2=0.68,P<0.001),Logistic多元逐步回归分析结果表明,对IADL能否自理的预测,仅有RBMT总分进入模型。结论:脑卒中患者的行为记忆能力对预测其在家庭和社区中的IADL水平有重要意义。 Objective:To distinguish the memory influenced factors of IADL for the patients with stroke and to explore the prediction value of IADL by subjective and objective memory ability for the patients with stroke. Method:52 cases of the patients with stroke were assessed in the study.The objective,subjective memory ability and IADL level were evaluated with RBMT,VAS and FAQ respectively.Result:①The RBMT total score was significantly positive related to the subjective memory ability for the patients with stroke(P<0.05);FAQ was significantly negative related to the subjective memory ability and RBMT(P<0.05,P<0.01).②Multiple stepwise regression analysis indicated that three factors of RBMT total score,items of the hidden matter and envelope entered the equation(P<0.05);RBMT total score was the remarkable predictive factor(R2=0.68,P<0.001).Logistic multiple stepwise regression analysis indicated that RBMT total score only entered the model to predict IADL. Conclusion:The behavioral memory ability may play an important role in predicting IADL level in the stroke patients.
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第4期273-275,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献31

  • 1赵友文,任桂英,翁雅琴,王庆同,徐文璇,张中兴,马辛.老年性痴呆与血管性痴呆智能障碍的比较研究[J].老年学杂志,1993,13(3):159-161. 被引量:5
  • 2姜建东,杨春水,陈俊宁.急性出血性脑卒中患者日常生活活动功能的变化特点及相关因素[J].中国康复医学杂志,1993,8(5):205-209. 被引量:5
  • 3许淑莲 王小明(等).脑梗塞的记忆研究[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1988,21(4):212-214.
  • 4Buonocore M, Manstretta G, Mazzu G, et al.The clinical evaluation of conservative treatment in patients with the thoracic outlet syndrome[J]. G Ital Med Lay Ergon, 1998, 20(4):249-254.
  • 5Capodaglio P, Gibellini R, Grilli C, et al. The assessment of functional capacity in workers with the thoracic outlet syndrome.A pilot study[J]. G Ital Med Lay Ergon,1997,19(2):15-19.
  • 6Landry GL, Moneta GL, Talor LM Jr, et al. Long-term functional outcome of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome in surgically and conservatively treated patients[J]. J Vase Surg,2001,33(2):312-317.
  • 7Beer S, Schlegel G, Hasegawa A, et al. Conservative therapy in thoracic outlet syndrome. Literature review and pathogenetic considerations[J]. Schweiz-Med-Wochenschr, 1997,127 (15):617 -622.
  • 8Erin DB. Diagnostic clinical neuropsychology: vascular disorders of the nervous system. Austin: University of Texas Press,1984.68-93.
  • 9Wilson BA, et al. The Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test.Titchfield: Thames valley Test Company, 1985.
  • 10Wilson B, et al. The development and validation of a test battery for detecting and monitoring everyday memory problemss. J Clin Exp Neuropsycol.1989,11:355.

共引文献404

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部