期刊文献+

明代文官荫叙制度考论 被引量:8

An Examination on the Policy of Favoring the Offspring of Civil Officers in the Selection of Officials in the Ming Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 明代文官荫叙制度始定于洪武十六年,但定而未行,明初文官荫叙皆属特恩。明中叶后,逐渐形成以阁臣荫叙为核心、以三品京官考满荫子入监为主体的文官荫叙制度体系;与前代相比较,不仅缩小了文官的荫叙范围,而且把荫叙与官员考核相结合,把承荫者纳入国子监教育入仕的轨道,从而有效地弱化了传统荫叙制度的消极影响,在激励官员忠于职守和提高荫叙官素质等方面发挥了积极作用。 The Ming policy of favoring the offspring of civil officers in the selection of officials was formulated in the 16 th year of the reign of Hongwu (1383), but was not enacted until mid-Ming. In the early days of the dynasty, the privilege was granted as a special favor from the emperor. It was gradually institutionalized from the middle of the dynasty on. The favor was mainly conferred on cabinet officials' posterity, while the offspring of court officials of the third-rank and above in their three-year assessment gained the privilege of entering the Guo Zi Jian (the imperial college). Compared with previous practice, the Ming dynasty rulers not only reduced the coverage of such a privilege, but also tied it with the assessment of officials. The beneficiaries were trained in the Imperial College before they were assigned to their posts. As a result, the negative effects of the policy were minimized, while its incentive function was brought into play in improving officials' commitment and the personal quality of the officials selected through this process.
作者 郭培贵
出处 《历史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第2期42-58,共17页 Historical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献18

  • 1王圻.续文献通考[M].北京:现代出版社,1986..
  • 2[1]胡广,等.明太祖实录[M].台湾史语所,1962年校印本.
  • 3[3]陈文,等.明英宗实录[M].台湾史语所,1962年校印本.
  • 4[5]郭培贵.明史选举志笺正[Z].呼和浩特:内蒙古大学出版社,1997.
  • 5[6]李东阳,等.明孝宗实录[M].台湾史语所,1962年校印本.
  • 6[7]张居正,等.明世宗实录[M].台湾史语所,1962年校印本.
  • 7[8]张居正,等.明穆宗实录[M].台湾史语所,1962年校印本.
  • 8[10]叶向高,等.明神宗实录[M].台湾史语所,1962年校印本.
  • 9[13]顾炎武.日知录[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1994.
  • 10[17]谢肇.五杂俎[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2001.

共引文献8

同被引文献88

引证文献8

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部