期刊文献+

奥地利学派与制度经济学:能否架起沟通的桥梁 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
作者 刘志铭
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第4期11-15,共5页 Academic Monthly
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1埃克伦德.《经济理论与方法史》[M].中国人民大学出版社,2001年版.第428页.
  • 2Sandye Gloria-Palermo, An Austrian Dilemma:Necessity and Impossibility of a Theory of Institutions, in Sandye GloriaPalermo (ed.), Modern Austrian Economics: Volume 3, London : Brookfied, 2002, pp. 37-38.
  • 3Rutherford, M . , Austrian economics and American (old) institutionalism, in The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics(Ⅱ), edited by Boettke. P. J, Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1994, pp. 530-531.
  • 4Boettke, P. , Evolution and Economics : Austrian as Institutionalists, in Samuels (ed.) Symposium on Austrian and Institutional Economics.
  • 5Rizzo, M. , Afterword: Austrian Economics for the Twenty-First Century, in Boehm and Cardwell (eds.), Austrian Economics :Tensions and New Directions. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992, p. 250.
  • 6Sandye Gloria-Palermo, The Convergence of Austrian Economics and New Institutional Economics, Methodological Inconsistency and Political Motivations, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 18, No. 2, 1999. p. 280.
  • 7Sandye Gloria-Palermo, The Extension of Subjectivism to Expectation : Lachmann's line of thought, TheEvolution of Austrian Economics : From Menger to Lachmann , Londont Routledge, 1999. pp. 116-132.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部