摘要
历史必然性的存在问题,从根本上来说是本体论的问题。讨论自然科学定律的形式是否适用于历史,都不能直接证实或否证历史必然性的存在。批评历史哲学从历史过程的思想性和重复性出发否定了历史必然性的存在;思辨历史哲学则从"人的活动的结果同目的的背离"出发,提出并论述了历史过程存在某种必然性和规律性。唯物史观认为,千百万人的全部生存活动、实践活动是对历史规律存在的最重要的本体论证明,就规律的存在而言,历史过程和自然过程之间不存在本质的区别。
The existence of the historical law is the problem of ontology fundamentally. Discussing whether the form of natural science law is applicable to history can not directly confirm the existence or nonexistence of the historical law. Criticizing historical philosophy denied the existence of the historical law from the thought and repetition of the history course; thinking and discriminating historical philosophy put forward and discussed the existence of the necessity and law in the history course from this point——the results of human activities violating their purposes. The existence of living activities and practical activities of millions people importantly confirm the existence of the historical law from the ontology and from the view of historical materialism. So for as the existence of law is concerned, there is no intrinsic difference between the history course and the nature course.
出处
《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第3期5-8,72,共5页
Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University
关键词
历史必然性
历史哲学
重复性
人的活动
historical law
historical philosophy
repetition
human activities