吐故纳新 激浊扬清——从四次危机看法国“影响研究”

AN INNOVATED SCHOOL LIVED THROUGH CRISES: A SYNTHETICAL STUDY ON THE FRENCH INFLUENCE STUDY

真正意义上的法国学派或“影响研究”既非克罗齐的檄文中所抨击的那种研究范式,亦非美国学派所责难的那种狭义研究,而是一种吐故纳新、激浊扬清的呈递进式发展走向的科学研究。换句话说,它通过扬弃与嬗变,不仅化解了重重“危机”,而且始终固守了比较文学之生命线———“文学性”和生存之根———“可比性”,从而既张扬了自身之所长又避开了其它学派之所短。

Of all the specific study approaches of comparative literature, the French Influence Study was for many years the object of strong criticism because of its positivistic scholarship method. However, it turned out to be a most controversial, yet vital, essential and scientific approach owing to a series of crises and consistent abidance by the three cardinal principles (crossing, comparability and literariness ) of the discipline.