期刊文献+

Molecular differentiation of the microgastrine species commonly found in paddy fields from Southeast Asia,with additional data on their phylogeny (Hymenoptera:Braconidae)

Molecular differentiation of the microgastrine species commonly found inpaddy fields from Southeast Asia, with additional data on their phylogeny (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)
原文传递
导出
摘要 Partial DNA sequences of three genes, that is, mitochondrial large ribosomal subunit (16S), nuclear large ribosomal subunit (28S D2) and mitochondrial NADH1 dehydrogenase (NADH1) gene, were sequenced from different microgas trine species(Braconidae: Microgastrinae) collected fresh from paddy fields. The DNA sequences were used to determine the extent of sequence variation among species in order to evaluate the specific status of each species. Cladistic analysis was also used to infer a phylogenetic relationship among these species. The results showed that sequence divergence among species of the same genus Cotesia was much lower than those among different genera, such as Cotesia, Exoryza and Apanteles; the sequence similarity of 16S rDNA and NADH 1 genes between Cotesia sp. and C. chilonis was higher than that between C. sp. and C. ruficrus.Phylogenetic analyses suggested that four species of Cotesia were always grouped in the same clade regardless of using different analysis methods; Cotesia sp. and C. chilonis are more closely related to each other than to C. ruficrus, different from previous morphological results. Additionally, sequence analyses indicated that NADH1 gene has more parsimony informative characters than 28S rDNA D2 and 16S rDNA at the species-level analysis,indicating that NADH1 gene might be a useful marker for species-level analysis. Partial DNA sequences of three genes, that is, mitochondrial large ribosomalsubunit (16S), nuclear large ribosomal subunit (28S D2) and mitochondrial NADH1 dehydrogenase(NADH1) gene, were sequenced from different microgastrine species (Braconidae: Microgastrinae)collected fresh from paddy fields. The DNA sequences were used to determine the extent of sequencevariation among species in order to evaluate the specific status of each species. Cladistic analysiswas also used to infer a phylogenetic relationship among these species. The results showed thatsequence divergence among species of the same genus Cotesia was much lower than those amongdifferent genera, such as Cotesia, Exoryza and Apanteles; the sequence similarity of 16S rDNA andNADH1 genes between Cotesia sp. and C. chilonis was higher than that between C. sp. and C. ruficrus.Phylogenetic analyses suggested that four species of Cotesia were always grouped in the same claderegardless of using different analysis methods; Cotesia sp. and C. chilonis are more closely relatedto each other than to C. ruficrus, different from previous morphological results. Additionally,sequence analyses indicated that NADH1 gene has more parsimony informative characters than 28S rDNAD2 and 16S rDNA at the species-level analysis, indicating that NADH1 gene might be a useful markerfor species-level analysis.
出处 《Insect Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第3期155-162,共8页 昆虫科学(英文版)
关键词 molecular differentiation MICROGASTRINAE COTESIA exoryza APANTELES paddyfield 膜翅目 寄生蜂 系统发育 东南亚地区 水稻鳞翅目害虫 分子鉴定 线粒体脱氢酶 生物防治
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献29

  • 1Quicke D L J, van Achterberg C, 1990. Phylongeny of the subfamilies of the familyBraconidae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea). Zool. Verh. Leiden, 258: 1-95, figs. 1-180.
  • 2Quicke D L J, Basibuyuk H H, Rasnitsyn A P, 1999. Morphological, palaeontologicaland molecular aspects of ichneumonoid phylogeny (Hymenoptera, Insecta). Zool. Scripta, 28(1-2): 175-202.
  • 3Saitou N, Nei M, 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method forreconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. , 4: 406-425.
  • 4Shaskey M J, Wahl D B, 1992. Cladistics of the Ichneumonoidea (Hymenoptera). J.Hym. Res., 1: 15-24.
  • 5Shaw M R, 1983. One evolution of endoparasition: the biology of some genera ofRogadinae (Braconidae). Cont. Amer. Ent. Inst., 20:307 -328.
  • 6Shaw M R, Huddleston T, 1991. Classification and biology of braconid wasps(Hymenoptea: Braconidae). Handbk Ident. Br. Ins., 7 ( 11 ): 1 -126, figs. 1- 126.
  • 7Shaw S R, 1997. Subfamily Rogadinae s. s. Chapter 35. In: Wharton R A, Marsh P M,Sharkey M J eds. Identification Manual to the New World Genera of the Family Braconidae(Hymenoptera). Int. Soc.Hym. Special Publication 1. 411 - 420.
  • 8Swofford D L, 2001. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony ( *and OtherMethods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • 9Thompson J D, Gibson T J, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins D G, 1997.The ClustalXwindows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by qualityanalysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 24:4876 - 4 882.
  • 10van Achterberg C, 1984. Essay on the phylogeny of Braconidae (Hymenoptera:Ichneumonidea). Ent. Tidskr. Leiden, 105: 41- 58.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部