摘要
以小学5年级和初中3年级的71名学生、他们的78名家长和71名教师为对象,以“声誉损害”、“财物损坏”、“人身伤害”三类内容为故事刺激材料,设置“不知道犯过者”、“不揭发犯过者”两种背景,从公正判断和理解判断两方面比较考察了他们的可交流集体责任观。结果表明,在可交流集体责任的公正判断上教师明显较少;在可交流集体责任的理解判断上教师和学生更为能够理解接受;两种背景和三类内容对可交流集体责任观会有一定的影响。
By examining justice judgment and understanding judgment, the paper explored collective and communicable responsibility with 71 students from primary and middle schools, their 78 parents and 71 teachers as subjects. Situational stories with two kinds of backgrounds and three kinds of contents were used as the stimulating material. The results showed that teachers' justice judgment about the collective and communicable responsibility among was much less obvious than the others', that teachers' and students' understanding judgment about the collective and communicable responsibility were much acceptable than parents', and the collective and communicable responsibility would be affected by the background and content of situational stories in some degrees.
出处
《心理科学》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2005年第3期518-522,共5页
Journal of Psychological Science
基金
上海市教委人文社会科学研究规划项目CW0115。