期刊文献+

《欧盟捕猎夹法规》实施的法律思考

The Legal Analysis on the Implementation of the Community's Regulation on Leg-Hold Traps
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在WTO多边贸易体制下涉及单边贸易限制措施的案件,至今没有一个实施单边措施的成员方胜诉。然而,自《欧盟捕猎夹法规》实施以来,至今无任何WTO成员方就该法规启动争端解决程序。通过对该法规与WTO规则的冲突与协调进行的分析,可以看出在双边谈判的基础上实施的该法规是富有创造性的单边贸易限制措施。 Under the framework of multilateral mechanism, cases concerning the implementation of unilateral measures, up to now, failed to win in the dispute settlements under WTO. Nevertheless, till the implementation of the Community's Regulation on Leg-Hold Traps is enforced, no Members of the WTO initiate any dispute settlement procedures on the implementation of such regulation. This article tries to, by analyzing the conflicts and harmonization between WTO law and such regulation, examine this creative unilateral trade restriction implemented on the basis of bilateral negotiations.
作者 严蓉 吴智
出处 《佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版)》 2005年第3期62-66,共5页 Journal of Foshan University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 《欧盟捕猎夹法规》 单边贸易措施 实施 the Community's Regulation on Leg-hold Traps unilateral trade restriction implementation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]JUNG Youngjin. Modeling a WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism in an International Antitrust Agreement- An Impossible Dream? [J].Journal of World Trade,2000, (1).
  • 2[2]H John. The Great1994 Sovereignty Deb-ate: United States Acceptance and Implementation of the Uruguay Round Results [J]. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 2000, (36).
  • 3[4]REINHARD Quick. Creative Unilateralism Made Com-patible with WTO Law through Bilateral Negotiations? [ M ]. Britain: Kluwer Law International, 2000.
  • 4[6]United States-Restrictions on Imports of Tuna[DB/OL]. http://www. wto. org, 2005-01-20.
  • 5[7]Appellate Body Report: United States-Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products[EB/OL]. http://www. wto. org, 2005-01-20.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部