期刊文献+

达马斯卡证据法思想初探——读达马斯卡《漂移的证据法》 被引量:8

Investigate the Ideas of Evidence Law of Damaska
下载PDF
导出
摘要 两大法系国家的证据制度具有相当大的差异,世界著名证据法学者达马斯卡所著的《漂移的证据法》对此作出了深刻的比较研究。这种比较研究对我国证据制度的建构和完善不乏启发意义。英美国家具有独立的证据法,大陆法国家则倾心于法官的自由心证,而缺乏独立的证据法。我国应当实行规范证明和自由证明的混合制度。 The two legal systems differ greatly in the evidence systems. The world famous professor of evidence law, Mirjan R.Damaska made a thorough and prolonging comparative study the difference in his work Evidence Law Adrift. His study has inspired China's construction and perfection of evidence systems greatly. So, China should adopt the mixed system and practice both standard proof and discretional proof
作者 汤维建
出处 《甘肃政法学院学报》 CSSCI 2005年第3期14-25,共12页 Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
关键词 证据法 漂移 思想 证据制度 两大法系 自由心证 自由证明 大陆法 混合制 国家 法官 evidence system discretional evaluation of evidence legal culture evidence rule
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1达马斯卡·漂移曾证据法[M].李学军,刘晓丹,姚永吉,刘为军,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.212.
  • 2Park, an outsiders' s view of Conamm Law evdence, 96Mich. L. Rcv. 1486,1493 (1998).
  • 3汤维建,等,译.麦考密克论证据[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社.2004.
  • 4James Bradley Thayer, A PreAiminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law,1898.p.264.
  • 5Rupert Cross, Colin Tapper, Cross on Evidence,7th ed. Butterworths, 1990.p.1 -2.
  • 6James Bradley Thayer, A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law,1898.p.266
  • 7John H. Langbein, Historical Foundations of the Law of Evidence:A view from the Ryder sources,Columbia Law Review June, 1996.
  • 8John H. Wigmore, Evidence in Trials at Common Law, Tdlets rev. Boston, 1983,p.608.
  • 9Langbein, the C.fiminal Trial before the Lawyers, 45U.Chi.L.Rev.263,306(1978).

同被引文献127

引证文献8

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部