摘要
两大法系国家的证据制度具有相当大的差异,世界著名证据法学者达马斯卡所著的《漂移的证据法》对此作出了深刻的比较研究。这种比较研究对我国证据制度的建构和完善不乏启发意义。英美国家具有独立的证据法,大陆法国家则倾心于法官的自由心证,而缺乏独立的证据法。我国应当实行规范证明和自由证明的混合制度。
The two legal systems differ greatly in the evidence systems. The world famous professor of evidence law, Mirjan R.Damaska made a thorough and prolonging comparative study the difference in his work Evidence Law Adrift. His study has inspired China's construction and perfection of evidence systems greatly. So, China should adopt the mixed system and practice both standard proof and discretional proof
出处
《甘肃政法学院学报》
CSSCI
2005年第3期14-25,共12页
Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute