4Kanal E, Shellock FG. Aneurysm clips: effects of long-term and multiple exposures to a 1.5 T MR system.Radiology,1999,210:563-565.
5Kangarlu A, Shellock FG. Aneurysm clips: evaluation of magnetic field interactions with an 8.0 T MR system.J Magn Reson Imaging, 2000,12:107-111.
6Klucznik RP, Carrier DA, Pyka R, et al. Placement of a ferromagnetic intracerebral aneurysm clip in a magnetic field with a fatal outcome. Radiology, 1993,187: 855-856.
7Evans JC, Smith ET, Nixon TE. A national survey of attitudes towards the use of MRI in patients known to have intracranial aneurysm clips.Br J Radiol, 2001,74:1118-1120.
8Lawton MT, Heiserman JE, Prendergast VC, et al. Titanium aneurysm clips: part Ⅲ--clinical application in 16 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurosurgery,1996,38:1170-1175.
9Dujovny M, Alp MS, Slavin KV, et al. Magnetic characteristics of yasargil aneurysm clips. Surg Neurol,1997,47:547-550.
10Dujovny M, Alp MS, Dujovny N, et al. Aneurysm clips: magnetic quantification and magnetic resonance imaging safety.Technical note.J Neurosurg,1997,87:788-794.
二级参考文献14
1Shellock FG,Crues JV 3rd.MR safety and the American College of Radiology White Paper.AJR,2002,178: 1349-1352.
2Shellock FG,Tkach JA,Ruggieri PM,et al.Aneurysm clips: evaluation of magnetic field interactions and translational attraction by the use of ''long-bore'' and ''short-bore'' 3.0-T MR imaging systems.Am J Neuroradiol,2003,24: 463-471.
3Shellock FG.Biomedical implants and devices: assement of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system.J Magn Reson Imaging,2002,16: 721-732.
5Sawyer-Glover A,Shellock FG.Pre-MRI procedure screening: recommendations and safety considerations for biomedical implants and devices.J Magn Reson Imaging,2000,12: 92-106.
6Sommer T,Vahlhaus C,Lauck G,et al.MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T.Radiology,2000,215: 869-879.
7Kangarlu A,Shellock FG.Aneurysm clips: evaluation of magnetic field interactions with an 8.0 T MR system.J Magn Reson Imaging,2000,12: 107-111.
8Hug J,Nagel E,Bornstedt A,et al.Coronary arterial stents: safety and artifacts during MR imaging.Radiology,2000,216: 781-787.
9Hennemeyer CT,Wicklow K,Feinberg DA,et al.In vitro evaluation of platinum Guglielmi detachable coils at 3 T with a porcine model: safety issues and artifacts.Radiology,2001,219: 732-737.
10Shellock FG,Shellock VJ.Metallic stents: evaluation of MR imaging safety.AJR,1999,173: 543-547.
4Hug J, Nagel E, Bornstedt A, et al. Coronary arterial stent : safety and artifacts during MR imaging [ J ]. Radiology, 2000,216 ( 3 ) :781 - 787.
5Shellock FG, Morisoli S, Kanal E. procedures and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: 1993 update [ J]. Radiology, 1993, 189(2) : 587 -599.
6Shellock FG, Crues JV 3^rd. MR safety and the American College of Radiology White Paper[ J ]. AJR,2002,178 (6) : 1349 - 1352.
7Gerber TC, Fasseas P, Lennon RJ, et al. Clinical safety of magnetic resonance imaging early after coronary artery stent placement [ J ]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2003, 42(7) :1295 -1298.
8Porto I, Selvanayagam J, Ashar V, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging one to three days after bare metal and drug - eluting stent implantation [ J ]. Am J Cardiol,2005,96 ( 3 ) : 366 - 368.
