期刊文献+

论行政复议调解的可能与规范 被引量:4

Intercession in administrative reconsideration: possibility and regulations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统行政法学理论认为,行政复议不适用调解的理由主要是行政权不能由行政机关自由处分、行政机关与相对人地位不对等以及调解不能实现公平正义等。这些理由均不能成立。在行政复议中适用调解能够充分尊重当事人对解决行政争议方式的选择权,突出“以人为本”的行政管理理念,有利于简便高效地解决纠纷,减少当事人之间的对立情绪,维护社会稳定,并为法律的完善提供实践经验。行政复议调解应遵循自愿、合法、涉及公共利益的案件不适用调解以及利害关系人全部参加调解等原则,并应注意其与现行制度的整合。 Traditional administrative law theory unreasonably holds that intercession cannot be applied in the process of administrative reconsideration due to the following reasons: administrative power should not be used freely by administrative agencies, the administrative agency and common people are not at the equal position, and fairness cannot be obtained through intercession. There are many merits of applying intercession in administrative reconsideration: respecting the parties' choice of how to resolve the dispute, accessing the administrative goal of 'human are the most important', diminishing the conflicts between the parties, maintaining the social stabilization and providing evidence for amending related laws.
作者 王小红
机构地区 浙江大学
出处 《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2005年第3期33-36,共4页 Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 行政复议 调解 调解原则 administrative reconsideration intercession principles of intercession
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献16

共引文献150

同被引文献23

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部