期刊文献+

词汇判断中汉语多义词识别的优势效应 被引量:5

THE EFFECTS OF POLYSEMY FOR CHINESE WORDS IN LEXICAL DECISION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用词汇判断任务,考察了汉语双字词识别中的多义性效应。实验一运用2个真字任意组合构成的假词(如:镜社)作填充材料,发现多义词识别的优势效应仅仅存在于错误率中。实验二运用与源真词(如:冲锋)同音形似的假词(如:冲烽)作填充材料,促使被试更多地在语义水平上做出判断,结果发现很强的多义词识别的优势效应,这种效应主要表现在低频词上。两个实验结果表明,在词汇判断中用不同的假词作填充词会影响被试的词汇判断策略,从而在不同水平上通达词义。最后,用反馈模型对实验结果进行了解释。 Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of polysemy in the identification of Chinese two- character words in the lexical decision tasks. In experiment 1,with a filler word (e.g.,镜社) consisting of two Chinese characters ranged randomly,a polysemous advantage effects was observed only in the error rates. In Ex- periment 2,however,with a filler word (e.g.,冲烽) as composed of two Chinese characters which were pseudoho- mophonetic and similar- graph with the two Chinese characters forming a polysemous word (e.g.,冲锋),there were a robust polysemous advantage effects mainly in low frequent words and a significant interaction between polyse- my and frequency. The results of two experiments showed that when different foils were used in the lexical de- cision tasks,subjects adopted different strategies in the different foils contexts,and acceded to the different se- mantic levels of words. The implications of these results for conclusions were best accounted for in terms of the the feedback accounts.
出处 《心理与行为研究》 2005年第2期116-120,共5页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 国家攀登计划95-专-09项目的资助
关键词 多义词 多义性效应 词汇判断 反馈模型 polysemous word,polysemy effect,lexical decision,the feedback accounts.
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]Kellas G,Ferraro F R,Simpson G B.Lexical ambiguity and the time course of attentional allocation in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,1988,14 (4):601~609
  • 2[2]Borowsky R,Masson M E.Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory and Cognition,1996,22 (1):63~85
  • 3[3]Hino Y,Lupker S J.Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming-alternative to lexical access accounts.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,1996,22,1331~1356
  • 4[4]Jastrzembski J E.Multiple meaning,number of related meaning,frequency of occurrence,and the lexicon.Cognitive Psychology,1981,13,278~3059
  • 5[5]Rueckle J G.Ambiguity and connectionist networks:Still setting into a solution:Commentary on Joordens and Besner (1994).Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1995,21,501~508
  • 6陈宝国,彭聃龄.汉语双字多义词的识别优势效应[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):300-304. 被引量:11
  • 7王春茂,彭聃龄.多词素词的通达表征:分解还是整体[J].心理科学,2000,23(4):395-398.
  • 8[11]Azuma T,Van Ordan G C.Why SAFE Is Better Than FAST:The relatedness of a word's meaning affects lexical decision time.Journal of Memory and Language,1997,36,484~504

二级参考文献14

  • 1Modern Chinese Frequency Dictionary (in Chinese). Beijing Language Institute Publisher, 1986(现代汉语频率词典.北京语言学院出版社,1986)
  • 2张钦 张必隐.中文双字词的具体性效应研究[J].心理学报,1997,29(2):216-223.
  • 3Rubenstein H, Garfield L, Millikan J A. Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,1970, 9:487-494
  • 4Jastrzembski J E. Multiple meaning, number of related meaning, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology,1981, 13:278-305
  • 5Hino Y, Lupker S. Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1996, 22:1331-1356
  • 6Borowsky R, Masson M E. Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory, and Cognition, 1996,22:63-85
  • 7Azuma T, Van Orden G C. Why safe is better than fast: The relatedness of a word's meaning affects lexical decision times. Journal of Memory and Language, 1997, 36:484-504
  • 8Millis M L, Button S B. The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: Now you see it, now you don't.Memory and Cognition,1989, 17:141-147
  • 9Gernsbacher M A. Revolving 20 years of inconsistent interaction between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1984, 113:256-281
  • 10Kawamoto A H, Farrar W T, Kello C. When two meanings are better than one: Modeling the ambiguity advantage using a recurrent distributed network. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1994, 20:1233-1247

共引文献16

同被引文献30

引证文献5

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部