摘要
本文比较了塞尔基于言语行为理论对虚构话语的逻辑地位的解释和汉伯格根据特定语言模式所得出的虚构话语非交际论,分析了二者的矛盾之处,并利用塞尔本人的理论来调和其中的对立,以界定虚构话语的本质。
The thesis first compares Searle's speech act-based explanation of the logic status of fictional discourse and the non-communication theory of fictional discourse developed by Hamburger on the basis of certain linguistic patterns, and then tries to fix the defining features of the fictional discourse in an attempt to reconcile the two conflicting approaches to fictional discourse in terms of Searle's own theory.
出处
《外语研究》
北大核心
2005年第3期1-6,共6页
Foreign Languages Research