期刊文献+

不同起搏方式对病态窦房结综合征预后的影响 被引量:3

Influence of different pacing modales on the prognosis in patients with sick sinus syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较单心室起搏(VVI)和双腔起搏(DDD)对病态窦房结综合征(SSS)患者快速房性心律失常和心功能的影响。方法:对97例VVI、20例DDD患者进行6个月随访,观察临床症状、心电图、24 h动态心电图、心脏超声等变化情况。结果:与DDD组相比,VVI组术后持续性心房纤颤及新出现快速房性心律失常的总发生率较高(P<0.05),左心房直径(LAD)增大、左心室射血分数(LVEF)下降较明显(P<0.05)。结论:SSS患者DDD的预后优于VVI。 Objective: To compare the influence of VVI and DDD pacing model on the incidence of atrial tachyrhythmia and heart function in patients of sick sinus syndrome (SSS). Methods : A 6 months follow-up survey including clinical examination, electrocardiography, dynamic electrocardiography and ech-ocardiography was carried out in VVI(97cases) and DDD(20 cases)pacing patients. Results:Compared with the DDD group, the total incidence of sustained artial fibrillation and new atrial tachyrhythmia post operation in VVI group was much higher, left atrial diameter(LAD)much larger, and the left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF) decreased more significantly. Conclusion:The prognosis of SSS in the DDD group is significantly superior to that in the VVI group.
出处 《医学研究生学报》 CAS 2005年第B05期88-90,共3页 Journal of Medical Postgraduates
关键词 起搏方式 病态窦房结综合征 预后 Pacing modalities Sick sinus syndrome Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Lamas GA, Lee K, Sweeney M et al. The mode selection trial(MOST) in sinus node dysfunction: design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of the first 1000 patients [ J ]. Am Heart J,2000, 140(4) :541-551.
  • 2Bellocci F, Spampinato A, Ricci R et al. Antiarrhythmic benefits of dual chamber stimulation with rate-response in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and chronotropic incompetence: a prospective, multi-center study [ J ]. Europace 1999,1 ( 4 ): 202-205.
  • 3Ishikawa T, Kimura K, Yoshimura H et al. Acute changes in left atrial and left ventricular diameters after physiological pacing [ J ].Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 1996,19 (2): 143-149.
  • 4Tse H, Lau CP. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997,29(4) :744-749.
  • 5Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardio-vascular causes: canadian trial of physiologic pacing investigators[J]. N Engl J Med, 2000,342(19) :1385-1391.
  • 6姚济华,周洪莲,李仁立.不同起搏方式对病窦综合征患者房颤发生率的影响[J].临床内科杂志,2002,19(2):120-122. 被引量:2
  • 7吴荣,滕志涛,李卫华,张丽娟,谢强.起搏方式对病窦综合征伴阵发性房颤的影响[J].福建医科大学学报,2003,37(4):419-420. 被引量:2
  • 8汤宝鹏,杨毅宁,王方正,马依彤,王疆,程祖亨.DDD起搏对病窦综合征患者阵发性心房颤动的远期影响[J].起搏与心脏,2003,17(2):106-108. 被引量:10

二级参考文献5

共引文献11

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部