应用微波与电灼治疗宫颈糜烂的对比观察

Comparative Observation of Carrical Erosion Treated by MicrowaVe and Electrocoagulation

目的 选择治愈率高、损伤小的宫颈糜烂疗法。方法 将宫颈糜烂患者 90 0例随机抽样分成两组 ,分别行微波治疗与传统电灼术 ,两个月后复查 ,进行疗效观察。结果 微波治疗一次治愈率 92 %。总有效率 10 0 % ,电灼术一次治愈率 75 % ,总有效率 91%。两组比较差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 1)。结论 微波治疗宫颈糜烂较电灼术有疗效高、愈合快、副作用小。

Objective To observe the effect of microwave and electrocoagulation treating cerrical erosion. Methods 900 cases were randomly divided into two groups,the microwave therapy group and the electrocoagulation therapy group. After two months, observing the change of cerrical to determine the effect of treatment. Results The first curative rate was 92%,the total response rate was 100% in the microwave group, and the first curative rate was 75%,the total response rate was 91% in the eilctrocoagulation group. There was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.01). Conclusion Microwave therapy is more effective and rapid, and is easy to operate compared with electrocoagulation, and worth popularizing.