期刊文献+

《退斋记》与许衡刘因的出处进退——元代儒士境遇心态之一斑 被引量:11

The Situation and Mentality of the Yuan Dynasty Confucian Scholars as Seen in Tui Zhai Ji
原文传递
导出
摘要 许衡和刘因是元朝前期北方两大理学名儒,但二人的关系却有些微妙。刘因有一篇文章《退斋记》,不点名地严厉批评当时政坛上的一位大人物,一些学者猜测其批评对象就是许衡,但也有人不同意这种看法。实际上,《退斋记》确系影射许衡之作。许衡在元初政坛屡出屡退,《退斋记》对他的批评有一定根据;但《退斋记》将许衡的行为指斥为“老氏之术”、“以术欺世”,则是求之过深,责之过苛,反映出刘因对许衡怀有很强的误解和成见。这种误解和成见,与刘因个人的经历、性格、思想有着密切关系,从一个侧面反映出元朝统治下汉族儒士生不逢时的悲剧命运。 Xu Heng and Liu Yin, two leading Confucian scholars in the north in the Yuan dynasty, had a rather subtle relationship. In his essay Tui Zhai Ji, Liu excoriated one of the celebrities in the political arena without mentioning his name. Some researchers hypothesized that Liu was criticizing Xu Heng, although others disagreed. As a matter of fact, it was indeed Xu Heng that Liu was alluding to in the essay. Xu Heng advanced into and retreated from the political arena several times, which provided good grounds for criticism. However, Liu was hypercritical in accusing Xu of “playing tricks” and “cheating the world.” He seemed to have a strong prejudice against Xu which was closely related to his personal experience, character and mentality. It was one facet of a prism that reflected the tragic fate of ethnic Han scholars under Mongol rule.
作者 张帆
出处 《历史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第3期69-84,共16页 Historical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献100

  • 1吴明.《荐刘先生充国子祭酒书》.刘因.《刘文靖公文集》卷27《附录上》.《北京图书馆古籍珍本丛刊》本,第1a—4a页.
  • 2程钜夫.《雪楼集》卷21《故平阳路提举学校官陈先生墓碑》.阳湖陶氏涉园影印明洪武刊本,第9a—11b页.
  • 3苏天爵.《滋溪文稿》卷14《内丘林先生墓碣铭》.陈高华,孟繁清点校.北京:中华书局,1997年.第223页.
  • 4《刘文靖公文集》卷7.第4a页.
  • 5《刘文靖公文集》卷18.第5a—7a页.
  • 6苏天爵编.《国朝文类》卷28.四部丛刊本,第7a—9b页.
  • 7全祖望.《鲒琦亭集》外编.四部丛刊本,卷31,第13a—14a页,卷33,第8b—9b页.
  • 8杜维明.《刘因儒家隐逸主义解》.
  • 9Hok-lam Chen and Wm.Theodore de Bary(eds.),Yuan Thought:Chinese Thought and Religion Under the Mongols,New York:Golumbia University Press,1982.
  • 10参见杜维明《道·学·政:论儒家知识分子》,上海人民出版社2000年版,第1-29页。

共引文献29

同被引文献136

引证文献11

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部