2[2]Mackenzie N,Grant IS.Propofol for intravenous sedation.Anaesthesia,1987,42:3.
3[3]Ghouri AF,Ruiz MA,White PF.Effect of flumazenil on recovery after midazolam and propofol sedation.Anesthesiology,1994,81:333.
4[4]Smith I,White PF,Nathanson M,et al.Propofol:an update on its clinical use [review].Anesthesiology,1994,81:1005.
5Mccleane GJ. Factors that influence the induction dose of propofoh Anaesthesia,1991,46:59.
6Deagan R, Wood AJJ, Wood M. Propofol markedly inhibits synpathetic activity: Assesment of NE kinetic in dogs. Anesth Analg, 1991,72(Suppl 2):549.
7Lindgran L, Yli-Hankals A, Randell T, et al.Jaeraodynamic and catecholamine responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intuhation:Comparison between propofol and thiopentone, Br J Anaseth,1993,70 : 306.
8Harris CE. Effects of thiopentone, etomidate and propofol on the haemodynamic respones to tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia,]988,43(Suppl):42.
9Mcco llum JSC. Comparison of the induction characteristics of four intravenons anesthetic agents.Anaesthesia, 1986,41 : 995,.
10Mackenzie N. Comparison of the new enulsion formalation ot propofol with methohexitone and thiopentone for induction of anesthesia in day cases. Br J anaesth,1985,57:725.
