期刊文献+

逻辑学:从“是”到“蕴涵” 被引量:3

Logic: From "Be" to "Imply"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “是”是逻辑学研究的一个核心概念,探究“是”这一系词所表示的明晰的逻辑关系一直是逻辑学家们所努力的工作。本文通过对于“是”与“蕴涵”之间联系的历史探索,试图澄清传统逻辑与现代逻辑的历史连续性和内在一致性。 The copula word 'be' is a core concept in logical studies. Logicians have been working at its definite logical relations with great efforts. Through a historical exploration of the connection between 'be' and 'imply,' this paper seeks to clarify the historical continuity and internal coherence from traditional to modern logic.
作者 张留华
出处 《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第3期18-24,共7页 Journal of East China Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 系词 关系 蕴涵 现代逻辑与传统逻辑 be, copula, relation, implication, traditional logic, modern logic
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1J. M. Baldwin (ed.). Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology [Z]. The Macmillan Company, 1925.
  • 2John Neville Keynes. Studies and Exercises in Formal logic [M]. London: Macmillan, 1928.
  • 3C, I. Lewis. A Survey of Symbolic Logic [M]. NewYork: Dover Publications, Ins., 1960.
  • 4约翰·巴斯摩尔 洪汉鼎译.哲学百年·新近哲学家[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996..
  • 5I, M. Bochenski, A History of Formal Logic [M]. Translated and edited by lvo Thomas, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1970.
  • 6Charles Sanders Peirce. Writings of Charles S, Peirce: a Chronological Edition [C]. Edited by the Peirce Edition Project. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1982.
  • 7Charles Sanders Peirce. Collected Papers of C. S. Peirce [C]. Edited by Charles Hautshome and Paul Weiss, Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1931-1958.
  • 8Geraldine Brady. From Peirce to Skolem: A Neglected Chapter in the History of Logic [M]. North- Holland, 2000.
  • 9H, Putnam, Peirce the Logician [J]. Historia Mathenmtitca, 1982, 9: 290-301.

共引文献2

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部