期刊文献+

海岸路桥工程的绿色预算 被引量:3

“Green” Budget for Coastal Roads
下载PDF
导出
摘要 阐述海岸路桥工程在建设期和营运期对生态环境的影响,如工程建设对陆域和海域生物、水土保持、水质及一些特征生态系统(湿地)等的影响,并提出将其定量化的方法.文中采用专家法和综合评价法,提出了剔除环保投入后的生态净损失综合计算体系,并将生态净损失纳入到工程预算中,使工程预算更加合理,有利于近岸生态系统的可持续发展. The construction and use of coastal roads,implies the loss,degradation and fragmentation of habitats.However,the present budget excludes these ecological losses.As a result,the government and the public have to bear the subsequent increasing investment.Therefore,a more sustainable budget system,or a “green budget” should be established.A “Green budget” can thoroughly account for ecological loss and can make environmental investment more rational,which is different from the traditional budget system.In this article,from the project point of view,the adverse ecological impacts which the coastal roads (including sea-crossing bridges)brought during construction (short-term effects) and after construction (long-term effects) are emphasized.The construction of coastal roads will impact living creatures,the quality of soil and seawater,hydrology,geology,marine substrate and the health of some valuable ecosystems,such as wetland ecosystems.Furthermore,multiple principles are determined in an effort to both make the evaluation process more applicable in the future and to easily assess ecological loss in monetary terms.Then the method of expert judgment and multi-criteria analysis is adopted to calculate the net ecological loss.Lastly,it is very important and essential to put the net ecological loss into the current budget system,in order to make the present budget system more sustainable.
出处 《厦门大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第B06期89-92,共4页 Journal of Xiamen University:Natural Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(40371049) 福建省自然科学基金(D031002)资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Ruud Cuperus,Kees J Canters,Helias A.Udo de Haes,et al.Guidelines for ecological compensation associated with highways[J].Biological Conservation,1999,90:41-51.
  • 2TJ005-96.公路建设项目环境影响评价规范(试行)[S].[S].,..
  • 3GB/T19485-2004.海洋工程环境影响评价技术导则[S].[S].,..
  • 4刘朝晖 秦仁杰.公路环境与景观设计[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2004.54-55.
  • 5Geneletti David.Using spatial indicators and value functions to assess ecosystem fragmentation caused by linear infrastructures[J].International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2004,5:1-5.
  • 6Ledoux L,Turner R K.Valuing ocean and coastal resources:a review of practical examples and issues for further action[J].Ocean and Coastal Management,2002,45:590-597.
  • 7张丽,雷亨顺.基础设施建设生态损失的定量分析——以重庆市万州区为例[J].环境保护,2004,32(3):29-33. 被引量:4
  • 8庄大昌.洞庭湖湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].经济地理,2004,24(3):391-394. 被引量:146
  • 9杨晓清.高等级公路建设对湿地的影响及对策[J].公路,1999,44(7):9-11. 被引量:8

二级参考文献22

  • 1蔡志洲.论公路建设的生态影响[J].公路交通科技,1995,12(1):43-48. 被引量:39
  • 2王光英.洞庭湖治理与开发[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,1998.10-13.
  • 3贺建林.洞庭湖湿地现状与农业开发[J].地理学与国土研究,2000,15(2):118-126.
  • 4谢炳庚 李晓青 程伟民.湿地景观生态学理论和方法研究[M].长沙:中南工业大学出版社,1998.241-243.
  • 5Shanshin Ton a, Howard T. Odum b , Joseph J. Delfino, Ecological-economic Evaluation of Wetland Management Alternatives[J]. Ecological Engineering, 1998,(11):291-302.
  • 6Paulo A.L.D. Nunes, Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, Economic Valuation of Biodiversity: Sense or Nonsense?[J].Ecological Economics, 2001,(39):203-222.
  • 7Richard T. Woodward, Yong-Suhk Wui, The Economic Value of Wetland Services: a Meta-analysis[J]. Ecological Economics,2001,(37):257-270.
  • 8Thomas P. Simon, The Use of Biological Criteria as a Tool for Water Resource Management[J].Environmental Science & Policy, 2000,(3):43-49.
  • 9A·迈里克·弗里曼.环境与资源价值评估-理论与方法,曾贤刚译[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.109-190.
  • 10TomTietenberg.环境与资源经济学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2001.86-100.

共引文献164

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部