期刊文献+

卡维地洛与美托洛尔治疗慢性心力衰竭的长期疗效观察

Long-Term Observation on Clinical Effeetive Comparison between Carvediol and Metoprolol in Treating Chronic Heart Failure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比第三代β受体阻滞剂卡维地洛(carvediol)与第二代β受体阻滞剂美托洛尔(metoprolol)对慢性充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的长期临床疗效,为临床治疗的药物选择提供依据。方法81例患者随机分为卡维地洛组(n=43)和美托洛尔组(n=38),治疗6个月,监测治疗前后心率(HR)、血压(BP)、左心室内径(LVEDD、LVESD)、射血分数(LVEF)的变化。结果美托洛尔组心率的减慢明显优于卡维地洛组(P<0.01),卡维地洛组收缩压和舒张压的下降比美托洛尔组明显(P<0.05),卡维地洛组LVEF、LVEDD与LVESD的改善优于美托洛尔组(P<0.05)。结论美托洛尔有更明显的减慢性率的作用,卡维地洛有更好的降压、增加心肌收缩力,改善心功能作用,还表现出更强的逆转心肌重构作用。 Objective:To compare the long-term clinical effect of the two kinds of β-blockers on chronic heart failure so as to provide refeences for clinical drug selection.Methods:81 patients were randomly divided into two groups:carvediol group(n=43) and metoprolol group(n=38),and then the changes of heart rate,blood pressure,LVEDD,LVESD,LVEF,6MWT distance were observed during the treatment for 6 months.Results:The reduction of HR in metoprolol group was more obvious than that in carvediol group(P<0.01);the decline of SBP and DBF,and the improvement of LVEF,LVEDD and LVESD in carvediol group were more significant than those in metoprolol group(P<0.05).Conclusions:Metoprolol was more effective improving contractive power of cardiac muscle and cardiac function;in addition,carvediol presented more evident effect in remodeling of cardiac muscle.
作者 王丽辉
出处 《西南军医》 2005年第3期15-17,共3页 Journal of Military Surgeon in Southwest China
关键词 心力衰竭 充血性 卡维地洛 美托洛尔 heart failure congestive carvediol meroprolol
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1Ma X L,J Pharmacol Exp Ther,1996年,277卷,128页
  • 2Feurstein R,Pharmacology,1994年,48卷,385页
  • 3Ohlstein E H,Proc Nat Acad Sci USA,1993年,90卷,6189页
  • 4Lysko P G,Stroke,1992年,23卷,1630页
  • 5李肇仁,新药与临床,1990年,9卷,36页
  • 6李肇仁.新型扩血管药——卡维地洛[J].新药与临床,1990,9(1):36-38. 被引量:5

共引文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部