62例无张力与传统式疝修补术临床对比

Clinical comparison between tension-free and conventional herniorraphy (a report of 62 cases)

目的探讨无张力疝修补术的临床效果。方法对62例腹股沟疝患者分别实施传统疝修补术与无张力修补的临床资料进行分析比较。结果无张力修补术的手术时间、术后患者自主活动、恢复时间、住院时间显著短于传统疝修补术(P<0.05);术后并发症发生率、复发率显著低于传统方法(P<0.05)。结论无张力修补术近期疗效明显优于传统方法,特别对老年患者,值得临床推广。

Objective To explore the clinical effect of tension-free herniorraphy.Methods The clinical data of 62 patients who underwent conventional herniorraphy or tension-free herniorraphy respectively was analysed and compared.Results The operation time,ability recovery,hospital stay,postoperative complication and recurrent rate in tension-free herniorraphy were less than those in conventional herniorraphy(P<0.05).Conclusion The curative effect of tension-free herniorraphy is much better than that of conventional herniorraphy,and is worth extending in old patients.