期刊文献+

归有光非唐宋派考论 被引量:5

On Gui You-guang Not Belonging to the Tangsong School
下载PDF
导出
摘要 习见的各类文学史及相关论著中均将归有光划入唐宋派,但历史上对这一问题曾有过不同说法。从归有光的交往、文学主张及创作风格等方面去考察,很难得出归有光是唐宋派的结论。钱谦益过分夸大归有光与七子派的矛盾,有意淡化归氏与唐宋派之间的本质差异,此类误导应予澄清。 Gui You-guang was grouped as member of the Tangsong School in all kinds of literary history and relevant treatises commonly found.Actually there were different statements about which school he belonged to.To examine from such aspects as his contacts with friends,his literary claim,and his style of writing,we are unlikely to draw the conclusion that he belonged to the Tangsong School.Qian Qian-yi exaggerated the conflict between Gui and Houqizi excessively and intentionally gave a slight remark on the essential difference between Gui and the Tangsong School.This misleading should be clarified.
作者 何天杰
出处 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第3期68-73,84,共7页 Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
关键词 归有光 唐宋派 七子 钱谦益 Gui You-guang the Tangsong School Houqizi Qian Qian-yi
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1周振甫.《中国文学史·后记》[M].中华书局,1993年版..
  • 2.《李开先集·闲居集·吕江峰集序》[M].中华书局,1959年版..
  • 3归庄.《归庄集·书先太仆全集后》[M].上海古籍出版社,1984年版..
  • 4董其昌.《容台文集》卷二《凤凰山房稿序》 四库全书本[M].,..
  • 5王鸣盛.《西沚居士集·钝翁类稿序》 道光自怡山房本[M].,..
  • 6.《明史·魏校传》[M].中华书局,1979年版..
  • 7.《震川先生集·请敕命事略》[M].上海古籍出版社,1981年版..
  • 8.《唐荆川文集·与王比涯苏州》[A]..《四部丛刊初编》[C].上海书店,1989年版..
  • 9.《震川先生集·与王子敬》[A]..《震川先生集·与王昭明》[C].上海古籍出版社,1981年版..
  • 10.《唐荆川文集·钤山堂诗集序》[A]..《四部丛刊初编》[C].上海书店,1989年版..

共引文献12

同被引文献41

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部